The new maps suck, and so do the ones they've edited and so do the gametypes.
Armor lock is under-powered, the Magnum is OP, and they've almost ruined Alpha Zombies.
Sword Base is a shell of it's former self, and ALL of the maps they've edited, to be frank, are the -blam!-iest things I've ever played on.
They are either not able, or not willing to make new FREE maps, are killing the maps that exist, and are slowly killing Halo. Their biggest mistake? Listening to you guys.
You don't know anything about game developing, but they chose to listen to you.
Big Mistake.
The game was FINE, until 343. Alpha zombies was the only thing good added to the game, ever.
And everyone online sucks anyways, because everyone that used to post here started playing halo. I play the game for Alpha Zombies and Custom Games.
It's very, very sad that this has happened. Expectations are low for Halo 4.
Anything else you want to bring on the table?
inb410yearoldwantingto1v1me
inb4whatsyourK/D
inb4reachtards
inb4callingmeafloodtard
EDIT
You idiots have been bumping and arguing in this thread for almost six months.
So I'll go ahead and edit the OP with DETAILS
It took me less than five minutes to write the OP
It's been some time since I originally made the OP
And I have come to the following conclusion
The Title update sucks :O
The maps suck
You guys suck
343 sucks
And what's left of the Halo Online community sucks :0
The Title update killed Reach.
[u] WHY I DO NOT LIKE THE TITLE UPDATE [/u]
The hitboxes are stupid
The grenades are mini-nukes
The DMR is basically a slightly-less powerful sniper rifle
Armor lock
The maps suck, even if they're not directly linked to the title update
It is going to remove several playlists I enjoy
(At least I wouldn't have to play those god-awful maps if there was a COMMUNITY playlist)
It HAS removed several playlists I enjoyed
Pistol is OP
Armor lock is HORRIBLY Under-powered
The duration of Armor Camo was reduced
Shield Bleed through (WTF)
Bloom was reduced (DOUBLE WTF. I'm tired of getting spammed by pricks with the DMR)
They Removed Sword block.
melee beatdowns require 3 full blows
Zero Bloom is horrible. It completely throws off the balance of the Halo Reach sandbox. The DMR becomes a full-blown power weapon, and the Needle Rifle is even stronger.
Personally, I still find that 85% bloom causes all the same problems as Zero Bloom
PLEASE don't talk to me about "REAL Halo" (2001 vet reporting in)
Also, if you want to Have Halo Reach be like Combat Evolved or 3..
THEN PLAY MOTHER-blam!- COMBAT EVOLVED OR 3
Because if you -blam!- and moan about Reach, and view Halo 4 as a solution?
Then quite frankly, you are stupid.
[Edited on 08.11.2012 11:29 AM PDT]
-
MegeNecroBump
-
The AI's do suck at driving though.
-
Magnum isnt OP you just suck :P
-
Reviving the post lol, it's so sad but so true, 343 ruined halo, I hope destiny can eventually get BUNGIE back to glory
-
I revived this post
-
I agree 343i officially ruined Halo. I blame Bungie for selling their rights to it. Halo 4 had by far the worst campaign I have ever played. The only time I was enjoying the game was when I was flying the Long Sword and that was too short. I do love the DMR however. I also enjoy the forunner weapons. And I am grateful they have continued the Saga but Damnit they need to do a better job.
-
343 have made some good maps but they took the fun things out of reach one of them being customizable nameplates. i can't be the only one who misses this unique halo feature can I?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] leospartan30o What the hell is wrong with the multiplayer? Please, indulge me. [/quote] You should join us in 2013.
-
*revivin' old top topicz* (click [url=http://www.bungie.net/en-us/View/community/Forum/Post?id=47679257]here[/url] for more of 'em)
-
Wow, you really have to go as far as posting an entire paragraph of the same blamite over and over again? There's really nothing wrong with it. Sure, the DMR is like a sniper rifle, because it's a [i]marksman's[/i] rifle. It's supposed to be really long range and pack a damn good punch. The multiplayer sucks? Says a lot about how you judge your games. I thought that Reach had the best frigging forge, still do. What the hell is wrong with the multiplayer? Please, indulge me. Campaign could have been just a tiny bit longer... and it's still my favorite next to halo 2. [Edited on 01.08.2013 7:58 AM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] disconect Dont really care about Reach anymore ,its more H4 now...[/quote]but reach is a better multiplayer game
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] THOMSY99 343 didn't ruin REACH. Bungie did. Bungie tried to make some new changes which are cool, unfortunatly broke the core of Halo.[/quote] ^ this. Didnt mind them experimenting, but not being ready or willing to fix anything was the problem. Sometime you have to break the mold and take risks, but you do so in parallel - not the core.
-
remind me again how armor abilities ruin halo?
-
Well, they are terrible devs since, they wanted to take away the only DLC playlist. I wonder why? Great way to get more people to buy the anniversary to cash in more money.
-
343 didn't ruin REACH. If you compared REACH to Halo 3. There were dramatic changes to the sandbox (AA), that not everyone was pleased with. The only main difference between Halo 2 and Halo 3, was equipment. The Equipment in Halo 3, was pick up and could only be used once. It didn't break the game. REACH AA (Loadouts) changed everything that was core about Halo. and Halo 4, has taken Reach and have improved it, but still this is the broken core of Halo, and many people are still angry. I would had much preferred Halo 4 to be Halo 3 improved with all the AA from REACH and Halo 4, to be new equipment. Halo would had been back to its core. 343 didn't ruin REACH. Bungie did. Bungie tried to make some new changes which are cool, unfortunatly broke the core of Halo. Reach is still a great game, but was not what I was expecting. Halo 4 is the same, as it is REACH 2.0
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ghost 4119 seriously, shutup.[/quote]who?
-
seriously, shutup.
-
Yeah, bungie lost it. why was reach such a crap game ... did they do it on purpose is some wierd attempted payback at Microsoft? Or some wierd kill-off-halo-brand-before-destiny plan? But then you have the whole aerospace and crimson projects. Meant to be bungies launch into pots new post-Microsoft life, how did that fail so quickly ... not like they can blame anyone else for the failure that turned into. Destiny ... so far its all hype. How very bungie.
-
IMHO, I think that Halo 3: ODST was the last good game. After that I never really got 'hooked in' like I did with the other games. Oh well, here comes 'Destiny'.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Ghost 4119 Reach is teh best.[/quote] ftfy
-
Reach is better, nuff said here
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] THOMSY99 You make a good point, I give the chef a kick. But hard to fix, what already is broken.[/quote] And you made a better point.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Oh GodLike One [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] THOMSY99 Eveything else is fine, as people who still play it like it how it is.[/quote] Can see what you are trying to say ... but not sure it holds true for everyone else who purchased the game or loved the halo series. Ok ... if a chef cooks your steak, but does so in a manner that only a dog would eat it ... but that dog loves it just the same ... should that cook keep on cooking steaks that way? ([i]or should the manager give him a kick up the arse and get him to cook steaks the way the customers want it[/i])[/quote] You make a good point, I give the chef a kick. But hard to fix, what already is broken.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] SubtleSpartan This has to be one of the most successful troll threads ever. Of all time.[/quote] Not really.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] A Blind Wolf [/quote] No, no I wouldn't. I would laugh at them and let them keep thinking that.
-
This has to be one of the most successful troll threads ever. Of all time.