{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/9/2011 4:52:45 AM
211
Explain why You Hate Bloom.
I find it a bit more realistic. Bullet spread would happen at a higher rate of fire.
EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT EDIT
Actually I now understand how bloom should have been. What one of yous said down below or something, the mechanics of bloom and how it should have been.
Guys, really? This thread is way too serious... Like, stop commenting... D:
[Edited on 12.12.2011 5:07 AM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Viper Skills I have already debunked the realism idea. I feel I need to now make a thread proclaiming to the world that bloom was NOT in previous Halo games. It was on automatic weapons (where it doesn't matter) and the other weapons had a spread, which is not the same as bloom. I don't know where people are getting the "The BR had bloom!" BS from.[/quote] It's not on autos, either. Not on the Halo 3 SMG, at least.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 [/quote] Have you ever fired a real weapon in your entire life? If so, what was it?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Sentox6 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 One fatal flaw. I'm not casual.[/quote] For crying out loud, you're still at it? Seriously, you haven't done anything except posit a ridiculously unfounded theory of "realism is more skillful". This is just stupid on so many levels. Quite tellingly, too, you're seriously bad at Halo. Actually, no, I'm [i]bad[/i] at Halo. You're something far beyond that. Surely you must have some sort of neurological disease?[/quote] I've told why realism is more skillful many pages back. Try to debunk it yourself, if you can. As for the Bloom being realistic, I've already decided for myself that it wasn't ages ago. In this very thread, no less. [Edited on 12.10.2011 1:49 PM PST]
-
Wait, people are arguing for realism? lolwut? This is Halo we're talking about, right?
-
Don't know the difference
-
I have already debunked the realism idea. I feel I need to now make a thread proclaiming to the world that bloom was NOT in previous Halo games. It was on automatic weapons (where it doesn't matter) and the other weapons had a spread, which is not the same as bloom. I don't know where people are getting the "The BR had bloom!" BS from.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 One fatal flaw. I'm not casual.[/quote] For crying out loud, you're still at it? Seriously, you haven't done anything except posit a ridiculously unfounded theory of "realism is more skillful". This is just stupid on so many levels. Quite tellingly, too, you're seriously bad at Halo. Actually, no, I'm [i]bad[/i] at Halo. You're something far beyond that. Surely you must have some sort of neurological disease?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darknova24 to those that go with realism.. please..stop. you are just casual gamers.[/quote] One fatal flaw. I'm not casual.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MFROG5 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] no weakness [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] st3althsniper22 Because randomness should never be programmed into anything. Playing with bloom is like rolling dice, it's totally random and has no skill with it.[/quote] But rolling dice [i]is[/i] a skill...[/quote]Shirley, you can't be serious? Let's make this clear... The [b]ACT[/b] of [i]ROLLING THE DICE[/i] does take some minuscule amount of cognitive function and muscle ability which can be argued represents "skill." That being said, the [b]OUTCOME[/b] resulting from that "skill" [b]DOES NOT[/b] have any correlation [i]to[/i] said "skill." The "skill" one exhibits "rolling dice" ENDS once the dice have been rolled. The sum of the dice are influenced in NO WAY by your initial "skillful" input. Otherwise, one would be able to predict and accurately roll the same sum of the dice over and over again. This we know is impossible because the rolling of dice is a [i]random event[/i]. No matter how "skillfully" you roll the dice the outcome will always be random. [/quote] This guy... Just destroyed every aspect of this stupid thread. There is nothing you can say against this post. It is completely true. Thanks no weakness.[/quote] Do you really think I [i]want[/i] to say something against it? He explained the very point of that post [i]for[/i] me. Without realizing it. Thanks indeed.
-
to those that go with realism.. please..stop. you are just casual gamers. bloom is all about luck and randomness which should never be placed in a video game franchise such as Halo.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bashmeister i like bloom, its been in all 3 games before but you didnt see it... [/quote] lolno. Not on precision weapons excluding the CE pistol if held down in full auto like a retard.
-
Turns the game into a coin flip to go alongside armor abilities turning it into rocks-paper-scissors.
-
Spammers get lucky!!!
-
lolbloom
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] no weakness [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] st3althsniper22 Because randomness should never be programmed into anything. Playing with bloom is like rolling dice, it's totally random and has no skill with it.[/quote] But rolling dice [i]is[/i] a skill...[/quote]Shirley, you can't be serious? Let's make this clear... The [b]ACT[/b] of [i]ROLLING THE DICE[/i] does take some minuscule amount of cognitive function and muscle ability which can be argued represents "skill." That being said, the [b]OUTCOME[/b] resulting from that "skill" [b]DOES NOT[/b] have any correlation [i]to[/i] said "skill." The "skill" one exhibits "rolling dice" ENDS once the dice have been rolled. The sum of the dice are influenced in NO WAY by your initial "skillful" input. Otherwise, one would be able to predict and accurately roll the same sum of the dice over and over again. This we know is impossible because the rolling of dice is a [i]random event[/i]. No matter how "skillfully" you roll the dice the outcome will always be random. [/quote] This guy... Just destroyed every aspect of this stupid thread. There is nothing you can say against this post. It is completely true. Thanks no weakness.
-
Irony is a -blam!-. Let's move on. I maintain my position that Bloom can be fixed. And [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHGItn8JCz0]this[/url] is what I mean by "fix".
-
Bloom. Because in real life the more you fire a gun, the shorter the barrel gets to the point where bullets begin to come out at 30 degree angles. I lol'd.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Cavik Akavelle Depends on the round the rifle fires.[/quote] You know a lot about 25th century weaponry.
-
i like bloom, its been in all 3 games before but you didnt see it... its also a l2p issue for most "herp derp spam that trigger mindlessly as fast as possible" is not possible this time around. LEARN TO PACE YOUR SHOTS
-
Bloom is retarded. if i wanted bloom i would go hipfire in cod
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Cavik Akavelle [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] UnsuccesfulTroll Well, if you want to be realistic, do you really think that a SPARTAN will feel the kickback of the rifle? Remember that they weight a lot and they are also very strong in that armor. I know that those spartan III suck but, still!!![/quote] Depends on the round the rifle fires.[/quote] Well, I dont know anything about guns but, [url=http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/M118_7.62x51mm_Full_Metal_Jacket_Armor-Piercing]I checked and this is the bullet it uses.[/url] Doesnt seem pretty big. We need a COD gun expert to give his opinion. [Edited on 12.09.2011 9:34 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] UnsuccesfulTroll Well, if you want to be realistic, do you really think that a SPARTAN will feel the kickback of the rifle? Remember that they weight a lot and they are also very strong in that armor. I know that those spartan III suck but, still!!![/quote] Depends on the round the rifle fires.
-
Well, if you want to be realistic, do you really think that a SPARTAN will feel the kickback of the rifle? Remember that they weight a lot and they are also very strong in that armor. I know that those spartan III suck but, still!!! And I hate it because it sucks, its random, blahblahblah. Im sure it has all been said before already.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Adm Hotpants The bloom in Reach is not a testament to the inaccuracy of the weapon through it's mechanical shortcomings, but because it's a gun and it's being held by a person. Anyone who's fired a weapon today knows that no matter how skilled you are as a marksman, firing rapid shots causes your accuracy to diminish. Literally, the only to eliminate what "bloom" is in real life is to mount the weapon on a tripod that is bolted to the floor.[/quote] I agree that the only reasoning behind bloom that actually makes any sense is that it would be the fault of the shooter, not the weapon, for it's inaccuracy. However, the DMR doesn't allow anyone to fire (what I'd call) "rapidly". The strict delay between shots doesn't let you fire one shot after the other, as fast as most people possibly can. The firing, and then ejecting of the cartridge happens incredibly fast (in reality, anyways); yet there's all this time being wasted in between shots. You're forced to watch your Spartan recover from recoil after each shot before you're allowed to shoot again, yet you still have to deal with so much bloom and inaccuracy? That doesn't seem realistic to me. Now, even that could make sense if it only happened while you were moving, but it doesn't. I'll be crouched down, aiming through the DMR sights, fire the weapon, and the bloom is exactly the same as when I'm running, jumping, all the while firing. [Edited on 12.09.2011 9:07 PM PST]
-
love bloom ha paradox
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Akamia179 And by this comment, you are no better.[/quote] Well, you really told me. I concede to your undoubtedly superior intellect.
