JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
1/28/2018 1:58:14 AM
44

Nation “Too Broke” for Universal Healthcare to Spend $406 Billion More on F-35

[quote]The nation’s most expensive weapons program isn’t done showing U.S. taxpayers how much it will ultimately cost them, with Bloomberg reporting Monday that the F-35 fighter jet budget is now predicted to jump by a cool $27 billion. “Think about [F-35’s] $405 billion price tag when a family member dies of a preventable disease. Get angry.” Though the estimated future cost of the program had previously hovered at a mind-boggling $379 billion, an updated draft that could be submitted to Congress as early as today will reportedly exceed $406 billion—a nearly 7 percent increase. The new cost increases may come as a hit to President Donald Trump, who has bragged about his ability to get weapons manufacturers to offer the Pentagon “better deals.” Others simply pointed out how ridiculous it is that a weapons program so fraught with failures is allowed to receive such outlandish funding when lawmakers—mostly Republicans, but also many Democrats—continue to argue that the nation is “too broke” to increase spending on social programs that improve education or healthcare. The original cost of the program was $233B, which is $721 per person for a year. The average healthcare costs for a person in Canada, is $4,506. Also keep in mind that the Pentagon has estimated that over the lifetime of the aircraft they’ll spend over a trillion dollars on the program. A number that keeps going up as the costs continue to overrun and does not include retrofits, modernization, or upgrades; just maintenance. [/quote] Sad.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by SpiRits: 1/28/2018 2:05:23 PM
    [b]Patients “dying in hospital corridors”[/b] http://www.bbc.com/news/health-42572116 http://www.bbc.com/news/health-42572110 Was doing a little research. 68 senior doctors sent a newsletter to the prime minister describing details of inhumane conditions that seem to be normal occurrences in NHS’s hospitals. The letter contained some stats and the following details: [i]In December alone over 300,000 patients were made to wait in emergency rooms for more than four hours before being seen, with thousands more suffering long waits in ambulances before even being allowed into the emergency room. The letter further noted that it had become “routine” for patients to be left on gurneys in corridors for as long as 12 hours before being offered proper beds, with many of them eventually being put into makeshift wards hastily constructed in side-rooms. In addition to this, it was revealed that around 120 patients per day are being attended to in corridors and waiting rooms, with many being made to undergo humiliating treatments in the public areas of hospitals, and some even dying prematurely as a result. One patient reported that, having gone to the emergency room with a gynecological problem which had left her in severe pain and bleeding, a lack of treatment rooms led hospital staff to examine her in a busy corridor, in full view of other patients.[/i] > [NHS] First week of 2018, over 97% of its trusts in England reported overcrowding so great, hospitals were deemed “unsafe” The prime minister bitched about the flu being widespread, but is that an excuse to leave dying patients in the hallway? Turns out though that officials from the Public Health England stated the current widespread flu levels are not unprecedented. Maybe, just maybe, Public monopolized health care systems are to blame? Just goes to show how naive the individuals claiming that the only the state can guarantee goods and services to the “public good” and how that justifies force. Sounds like all that is needed is to do is dump [i]even more money into the monopoly…[/i] On Healthcare: https://www.bungie.net/en/Forums/Post/238884485?sort=0&page=0 Also, in no way am I in favor of a tax funded mass standing army. A large standing army by nature at the hands of the state will always bring along the temptation to use it, in an aggressive, warlike, and interventionist sense. The standing army is inherently authoritarian and inevitably swells the states power, to push other nations around and dominate the internal life of its nation. It is a threat to liberty, with its monopoly on coercive weapons and its constant push the military industrial complex...I reject all tax funded institutions, but the army is unique for its amassing and monopolizing mass weapons and power at the hands of the state.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    31 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon