{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by FusionGlitter69:
8/23/2016 8:43:57 PM
52
Why Do Radical Islamist Apologists Always Bring Up The Crusades?
Seen it on here done numerous times in one single thread.
-When we talk about the terror these radical muslims are causing we are talking about the present, not the past. The crusades are completely irrelevent to what is going on now. Meanwhile Muslims are committing suicide bombings, beheadings, etc etc every single day across the globe. These things are a problem NOW, they are not events from the past like the cursades
-When you bring up how the Quran has over 100 verses in it encouraging Muslims to committ violent acts against non believers these apologists ALWAYS reply "Yeah well the bible blah blah". Can they not see that Christians arent out there committing acts of violence anymore than the average human being and obviously no where near the level of Muslims?
Also the irony in their rebuttal to the first point is that the Crusades were retaliation against the Muslims for prior invasions muslims did on christian lands but thats probably too much for these SJWs to digest
We have got to do something about our liberal problems
EDIT: We arent Trending! Keep it up guys
-
4 RepliesReligion always has blood spilled over it. Same shit, all through history.
-
Because it triggers people.
-
Love how you specify 'radical Islam ', when your whole point is there is no non-radical Islam. Kekekekekekekekek
-
Talking about old news? [spoiler]hold on let me get in touch with scarce[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyBecause the extremists do too. The Crusades were a goofed up time in which Christians were radicalized to kill people who did not think like them. The "apologists" bring it up to remind people that at one point the Muslims were on the receiving end of this, but on a much larger scale. Yet this was solved, not by wiping out every Christian on the face of the Earth, but by Christians discovering for themselves what Christ commanded of His followers. "Apologists" bring up the Crusades to remind people that the Abrahamic religions go through sometimes violent evolutions. In the end, there will be peace, but peace cannot be achieved by wiping Muslims out.
-
Edited by arosa-gti: 8/25/2016 5:10:01 PMThe Middle East was once christian, then it got invaded and populated for muslims. Christians just wanted revenge for the continuous Muslim invasions against them and reconquering lands that were brutally taken from them. Prepare to get enlightened ignorant islam apologists: https://goo.gl/images/Jp61ku
-
1 ReplyI red an interesting book back in highschool about the crusades. While the main story is fictionnal I think the events are quite "spot on". [spoiler]Atrocities.[/spoiler]
-
2 RepliesThe Crusades were an atrocity, but that still doesn't justify anybody just going around and killing anyone that they want hundreds of years later. That's like if the Jews went and started killing everyone, and the excuse was, "but [b]H[/b]itler did it to us first."
-
Edited by SniperPro997: 8/25/2016 2:04:11 PMThe crusades happened in the late 1200s it's been over 700 years. They have no relevance anymore. [spoiler]I have been proven beyond that I have to prove my name. The word.[/spoiler]
-
Yes the Old Testament was violent but it was a violent world back then since Jesus saved everyone by dying on the cross that violence was no longer need. Thus Christians follow the New Testament.[spoiler]yeah..[/spoiler]
-
Because they're still mad about getting rekt. It's like the "palestinians" who have a holiday celebrating (see: whining about) the day they got their ass kicked by Israel. Twice.
-
3 RepliesEdited by moist nana: 8/25/2016 7:08:55 AMRofl.. the Crusades were like... 5 Battles? There's like 60,000 + Muslim attacks a year, not including all the shit they did in history. + The Crusades were never targeted at Muslims, just the land they were on, it wasn't there land either they just happend to be in the way. The amount of Non-muslim lands the muslims have attacked outof faith FAR outweighs anyother relgion. Just in the past countrys knocked them back (I'm looking at you Spain)
-
Inb4crusadememes
-
1 Reply>implying the events of history don't have long term implications.
-
36 RepliesEdited by DontH8thaGravy: 8/23/2016 7:42:27 PMOriginally the crusades were to drive out the Muslims from the holy land but then the Christian king decided "hey not only will we drive them out, we'll go chase them to the far corners of the earth and commit atrocities and murder all Muslims and everyone who isn't a Christian ok?" I'm a Christian but I'm sorry, The crusades were an awful crime against humanity. Then some centuries later the ottomans and their Muslim king (who's name I do not remember) did the same thing so hey we're both guilty Edit: and yes the Muslims did invade the holy land but it was not necessary to hunt them down
-
Did you say... crusades? [Deus Vult Intensifies]
-
1 Reply[quote]When we talk about the terror these radical muslims are causing we are talking about the present[/quote] Not really true, to a lot of Muslims (especially the extremists) the crusades never ended.
-
11 RepliesLeaving this here https://themuslimtimes.info/2013/10/29/three-hundred-verses-about-compassionate-living-in-the-quran/ [spoiler]idiots[/spoiler]
-
6 Replies[i]Can they not see that Christians arent out there committing acts of violence anymore than the average human being and obviously no where near the level of Muslims?[/i] There are billions of Muslims. If even a significant fraction of them stayed bombing us we'd all be dead. It is in fact a tiny minority of nutcases committing these deeds. And yes, Christian terror groups exist, just because you don't realise this doesn't make it that way.
-
26 Replies[quote]We have got to do something about our liberal problems[/quote]Getting real tired of this bullshit.
-
1 Reply[quote]whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. [/quote] verse 5:33 of the koran
-
Because people like that,that are trying to justify their actions know they can't find a present reason, so they go as far back as they need to, to find some b.s. excuse for what they are doing. Similar to the current BLM.
-
Because they think it counter balances today's violence... but they don't actually know history, so they end up looking stupid.
-
4 RepliesThe crusades were a reactionary movement to muslim invasion. They should have gone further.
-
Because they are mentally ill.
-
11 RepliesEdited by iLL_Elegance: 8/24/2016 8:03:23 AMDuring the same time period as the crusades, Muslims also lead there own crusades. [spoiler]woah[/spoiler] [spoiler]plenty of people know who Salah ad-Din is too. (Saladin)[/spoiler]
