Do you think hard scoping is cheap? I've been seeing a lot of people say that hard scoping is cheap lately and I have been getting hate mail for so called "hard scoping" so I wanted to see if this is what everyone thinks Personally I don't think it is. There isn't a hip fire reticule meaning...guess what...YOU HAVE TO AIM. Also think of it as reality. How many times do you hear on the news some guy just wiped out an army quick scoping them. Never. The scope isn't there for style or looks, you are supposed to use it and be more stationary/immobile. If someone is camping in the back of the map with only their sniper then go flank them, you already know exactly where they are. If you get sniped from that angle multiple times that's your fault. After the second time you should pretty much realist they are gonna be camping there the entire time. So please quit saying it's cheap/cheating/cowardly etc cause it's not at all that. They are simply using the sniper the way it should be used. I feel that the only reason people hate it is because with the large shotgun nerf and the high aa yd stare, people can simply camp in the back of the map with their buddies and rack up a portion of kills. This also slows the games multiplayer down which makes the experience boring and even dreadful for some players. Also please explain why you have your opinion, I'd love to see why people think it is/isn't cheap. Edit: 100 replies in 1 day! Edit: another 100 replies in just a couple hours! Edit: WHAT!? We hit 300 replies in under 2 days!!! Edit: 400 replies! Looks like people agree that aiming your sniper isn't cheap!