{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/31/2005 7:50:46 AM
82
how old are you?
-
-
14 *thinks when bungie will make somebody else a mod*
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BCFan75 I'm 29...I'm getting too old for this[/quote] OK Danny Glover... ;-)
-
24 i like this game :D *Sits in corner in a fetal poisition [Edited on 6/6/2005]
-
I'm 29...I'm getting too old for this
-
Reig admitted he was wrong? *puts on tattered clothes, sign that says "[i]Repent[/i]" and starts preaching...* "The End of the World is Nigh!!!" Tristan :-)
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Well I'll be darned, I was wrong. Shoot me. I'm guessing the basic calculator I used messed up the indices. But my scientific and graphic calculators are at the other end of the house, and I was even too lazy to wait for Classic to start up to run the Graphing Calculator on this computer. All my constants were correct, it just got broken in the processing. I promise I'll never do it again. :) I've recalculated my age to actually be 4.138272x10^51. As God would say, I apologise for the inconvenience. And anyway, how many other people have posted their [i]real[/i] age here? ;) - Reiginko[/quote] Well, good job if you got that far without the aid of a graphing calculator (as I did, my graphing calculator even had the h, G and c variables already programmed into it). And I posted my real age at least, and without being cryptic about it. ;-) [Edited on 6/6/2005]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] hitokiri 1000 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Well I'll be darned, I was wrong. Shoot me. - Reiginko[/quote] You know, you really shouldn't tempt people like that... Who knows, maybe I'll actually post my age at some point here. :D[/quote] I have a spare cookie :D And seriously, I'm septillion and one.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Well I'll be darned, I was wrong. Shoot me. - Reiginko[/quote] You know, you really shouldn't tempt people like that... Who knows, maybe I'll actually post my age at some point here. :D
-
I'm 18. Trust me that is my real age.
-
Septillion and one.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] cemical panther [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Stan Darsh 18....(And I told myself I would never answer another 'What's your age thread'...*Sigh*) [/quote] H E R E T I C H E R E T I C this post was powered by the stupid side of cemical panther[/quote] These whole forums could be powered by your stupid side. ;)
-
Well I'll be darned, I was wrong. Shoot me. I'm guessing the basic calculator I used messed up the indices. But my scientific and graphic calculators are at the other end of the house, and I was even too lazy to wait for Classic to start up to run the Graphing Calculator on this computer. All my constants were correct, it just got broken in the processing. I promise I'll never do it again. :) I've recalculated my age to actually be 4.13531x10^51. As God would say, I apologise for the inconvenience. And anyway, how many other people have posted their [i]real[/i] age here? ;) - Reiginko [Edited on 6/6/2005]
-
im 12
-
That is just math; what us engineers/scientists call "plug-n-play". Just plug the numbers into the equation and you have an answer. It technically has nothing to do with physics as it is presented here, it is just derived from physics.
-
I agree with Hitokiri... I'm good at Maths but I don't like physics at all... Tristan ;-)
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dmbfan09 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Gaara of Sand [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dmbfan09 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Approximately 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times, to 9 significant figures, based on [i]h[/i] rather than [i]h[/i]-bar. - Reiginko[/quote] You could have just said 32... Edit: Oh yeah, I'm 24.[/quote] Just so you know... Either Reig or DMBfan need to touch up their maths... Reig is actually 17 going on 18... I myself am 17, but I'm constantly accused of being about 25 or older... :S Tristan ;-)[/quote] Must be Reiginko because: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_time]Planck time[/url] = ([i]h[/i]*G/c^5)^1/2 where [i]h[/i] = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac%27s_constant]Dirac's constant[/url] = 6.6260693x10^-34 kg*m^2/s ([i]h[/i]bar is [i]h[/i]/2π) G = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant]the gravitational constant[/url] = 6.6742x10^-11 m^3/kg*s^2 c = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light]speed of light[/url] = 299,792,458 m/s This gives Planck time as 1.35137x10^-43 s. Reiginko said that he was 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times; therefore 7.55126064x10^51*1.35137x10^-43 s ~ 1,020,458,384.89 s. 1 yr ~ 31,556,925.97 s. 1,020,458,384.89/31,556,925.97 ~ 32.3 yrs.[/quote] O_O Ummm...yeah...
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Gaara of Sand [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dmbfan09 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Approximately 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times, to 9 significant figures, based on [i]h[/i] rather than [i]h[/i]-bar. - Reiginko[/quote] You could have just said 32... Edit: Oh yeah, I'm 24.[/quote] Just so you know... Either Reig or DMBfan need to touch up their maths... Reig is actually 17 going on 18... I myself am 17, but I'm constantly accused of being about 25 or older... :S Tristan ;-)[/quote] Must be Reiginko because: [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_time]Planck time[/url] = ([i]h[/i]*G/c^5)^1/2 where [i]h[/i] = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac%27s_constant]Dirac's constant[/url] = 6.6260693x10^-34 kg*m^2/s ([i]h[/i]bar is [i]h[/i]/2π) G = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant]the gravitational constant[/url] = 6.6742x10^-11 m^3/kg*s^2 c = [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light]speed of light[/url] = 299,792,458 m/s This gives Planck time as 1.35137x10^-43 s. Reiginko said that he was 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times; therefore 7.55126064x10^51*1.35137x10^-43 s ~ 1,020,458,384.89 s. 1 yr ~ 31,556,925.97 s. 1,020,458,384.89/31,556,925.97 ~ 32.3 yrs.
-
i am {---------this much -------} old
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dmbfan09 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Approximately 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times, to 9 significant figures, based on [i]h[/i] rather than [i]h[/i]-bar. - Reiginko[/quote] You could have just said 32... Edit: Oh yeah, I'm 24.[/quote] Just so you know... Either Reig or DMBfan need to touch up their maths... Reig is actually 17 going on 18... I myself am 17, but I'm constantly accused of being about 25 or older... :S Tristan ;-)
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Reiginko Approximately 7.55126064x10^51 Planck times, to 9 significant figures, based on [i]h[/i] rather than [i]h[/i]-bar. - Reiginko[/quote]Wait...wha??
-
13!! mmmmm, adoleconce (sp?)
-
one hundred and forty-twelve
-
-
17 going on 18 in three months i cant wait its gonna be sweet
-
Why do you guys even talk about age on a game forums? I mean, whats the damn point?! Nobody cares that you're 56 unless they're self concious little retards worried there are too old to play at age 50. There really isn't any other reason!
