Everyone's heard the drama over the recent legal battle between Marty O'Donnell and Bungie. Turns out that Activision is responsible for screwing up Destiny at launch in the first place, which included a "revised" story campaign that delayed the release.
Now, I've played all the Halo games, and I've always known Bungie to have talent for writing; which is why Destiny's lackluster story came as such as surprise for many of us. Now it turns out that Activision is to blame.
So, the question is; should Bungie have stuck with Microsoft as their publisher for Destiny? PlayStation fans, try to be unbiased; think what you will of Micro$oft, but as far as I know they never sunk to the levels of Craptivision. I have a hunch that if Bungie stuck with the company that published Halo, we would've gotten a much better game at launch. Maybe some PlayStation exclusives would be Xbox exclusives instead (probably not for a full year, though), but aside from that...
Anyway, post your thoughts.
-
If they stuck with MS there would be no Destiny. They'd be forced to make Halo.