JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Destiny

Discuss all things Destiny.
9/8/2015 6:01:25 AM
1

Should Bungie have stuck with Microsoft?

Yes, they should've stuck with Microsoft.

33

No, they're better off with Activision.

8

F*** both companies.

9

Everyone's heard the drama over the recent legal battle between Marty O'Donnell and Bungie. Turns out that Activision is responsible for screwing up Destiny at launch in the first place, which included a "revised" story campaign that delayed the release. Now, I've played all the Halo games, and I've always known Bungie to have talent for writing; which is why Destiny's lackluster story came as such as surprise for many of us. Now it turns out that Activision is to blame. So, the question is; should Bungie have stuck with Microsoft as their publisher for Destiny? PlayStation fans, try to be unbiased; think what you will of Micro$oft, but as far as I know they never sunk to the levels of Craptivision. I have a hunch that if Bungie stuck with the company that published Halo, we would've gotten a much better game at launch. Maybe some PlayStation exclusives would be Xbox exclusives instead (probably not for a full year, though), but aside from that... Anyway, post your thoughts.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon