As of today, the game formerly known as [i]Halo 3 : Recon[/i] will henceforth be known as [i][b]Halo 3 : ODST[/b]. [/i]
[url=/news/content.aspx?type=news&cid=16289] click for full story [/url]
-
I definatly like ODST better, Sounds more official. xD
-
can someone explain why it's called halo 3 odst and not halo odst? hype? and since it's not halo 4 it sounds like a exspasion pack to halo 3 :P
-
Recon sounds more appealing but... it's not my game! :)
-
in recon do you think the chief will die or retire
-
why would they do that
-
I preferred Halo 3: Recon. But I guess that doesn't really matter anymore, does it?
-
YA I KNOW WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THEY SHOULD PUT MAPS THAT HAVE NOTHING ON THEM
-
I THINK HALO3 RECON WAS BETTER BECAUSE IT HAA MORE OF A MENING THEN SAYING HALO3:ODST SOUNDS LIKE IT IS A VERY BOING EXTENTION TO THE GAME ITS SELF AND THE EXSPANTION TO HALO3 SHOULD BE HOW MASTER CHIFE GETS FOUND AND THE HALO 2 GAPS COULD BE ADDED TO BUT MAKE IT SO THAT THE VIDEOS AND THE FLASH BACKS ARE CONNECTED SO THAT IT MAKES A GAME NOT JUST AN EXTETION AND HOW COULD IT BE THAT IF THE WAR WAS OVER IN HALO3
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ScarletRevenant Technically, wouldn't an analogous name to Halo 3: ODST be Halo 3: Spartan? Anyway, Halo 3: Recon was by far the better title. Halo 3: ODST sounds like something out of a cheesy TV commercial with a stupid rap jingle. "Don't go outside and climb that tree, play Halo 3: ODST!" LAME![/quote] Or Mayby It could be like "If you want a reason to sit on the couch and pee, play Halo 3: ODST" [Edited on 12.06.2008 8:58 AM PST]
-
Yea..,Almost. as mad as some people are right now they are still dieing to have it. LoL!
-
i know its -blam!- -blam!- that its 60$ im sure as hell not gonna buy it. its aknockoff of a game thats campain got old after about 10 days and thats all thats different the campain. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Retarded80 ok so how much are ppl looking to be spending on this game if its gunna be $60 i really dont think its worth it because the only thing new sounds like the campaign and from what ive read the multiplayer is still the same so i really dont think this is going to do so good i mean personally if its $60 i wont bother to buy it but i mean they could easily make it cheap and still make alot of money i mean how can you charge $60 for an add on of the game and the campaign is the only different think and then they are expecting us to buy the mythic map pack to for wut 800ms or more...but i wouldnt mind getting some feedback from everyone else[/quote]
-
i know halo 3 odst is so retarded it sounds like a last minute name like say it was moments before the launch date and bungie is like oh god we forgot to give the game a name, okay what is the main character in the game hes a odst! brilliant, i amase myself then like 2 people buy it. its just really sad.
-
-blam!- right lol
-
Nope, since you actually had to ask that question, I'm gonna just go ahead and tell you no there isn't. You will never get recon armor...
-
is there an achievment that gives u recon?
-
Technically, wouldn't an analogous name to Halo 3: ODST be Halo 3: Spartan? Anyway, Halo 3: Recon was by far the better title. Halo 3: ODST sounds like something out of a cheesy TV commercial with a stupid rap jingle. "Don't go outside and climb that tree, play Halo 3: ODST!" LAME! [Edited on 12.02.2008 12:01 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Urmomidopulus [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] italian templar [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] caboose0701 that is a horrible name, sorry, but it is[/quote] Can you give a reason as to why you think that?[/quote] Because -Like I said in my other post-they didn't call it "Halo 3-Master Chief", Halo 3: Recon sounded amazing, they got a cover article with that name, ODST will suck to ask people to play too.... Player 1: "Hey man, want to go play some COD5? Or L4d?" Player 2: "No man, let's go play some H3-ODST!" Player 1: "..."[/quote] You've got a good point. That's probably the other reason why I liked Recon better
-
I too will call it Halo 3: Recon any way...only because it flows of the tongue better, once the title was announced I was so excited that it was branded into my brain, and it uses less syllables.
-
You shouldn't judge before you have seen how it is.
-
ODST fits better to the next game then Recon im looking forward to try it out.
-
[b] Crazy enough it just might work [/b]
-
I preferred Recon.
-
sadface ='(
-
you could name it Buy This Game and i still would
-
ok so how much are ppl looking to be spending on this game if its gunna be $60 i really dont think its worth it because the only thing new sounds like the campaign and from what ive read the multiplayer is still the same so i really dont think this is going to do so good i mean personally if its $60 i wont bother to buy it but i mean they could easily make it cheap and still make alot of money i mean how can you charge $60 for an add on of the game and the campaign is the only different think and then they are expecting us to buy the mythic map pack to for wut 800ms or more...but i wouldnt mind getting some feedback from everyone else
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] EMoneyACIDPISS My guess as to the real reason of the change is that most players have put the Recon armor on a pedestal, and they don't want any free associating of that armor perm with this as yet unreleased game. Why? This game is going to be hated loudly by the general bungie community. Mark my words. They are fickle. They hated Halo 3. They will assuredly hate this. It makes me sad though. I love Halo. Every iteration thus far has been awesome. But there are haters out there that suck the fun out of everything. I can see the threads now. You have been warned.[/quote] He has a very good point