JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Britton: 3/2/2015 9:53:56 PM
105

Should children be protected from being indoctrinated?

Opinion on the video? [quote]Top scientists Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss advocate for children, arguing children should be allowed to develop as critical thinkers and be protected from religious indoctrination. Speaking with The Irish Times, Dawkins, a leading biologist, and Krauss, a leading physicist, defended a child’s right to a proper education. Dawkins said: [quote] There is a balancing act and you have to balance the rights of parents and the rights of children and I think the balance has swung too far towards parents. Children do need to be protected so that they can have a proper education and not be indoctrinated in whatever religion their parents happen to have been brought up in.[/quote] Krauss said: [quote]That means parents have a limited — it seems to be — limited rights in determining what the curriculum is. The state is providing the education, it’s trying to make sure all children have equal opportunity. And parents of course have concerns and a say, but they don’t have the right to shield their children from knowledge. That’s not a right any more than they have the right to shield their children from health care or medicine. And those parents that do that are often tried and imprisoned when they refuse to allow their children to get blood transfusions or whatever is necessary for their health. And this is necessary for their mental health.[/quote] Dawkins, Krauss, and other intellectuals make an interesting and compelling claim: forcing children to accept the religious superstitions of their parents can be a form of child abuse. [u]For example[/u], teaching children Biblical creationism as a legitimate scientific alternative to the theory of evolution is a form of child abuse. Yet if we are to accept this claim, what are the implications for social policy? Should the government step in and protect children from the religious superstitions of their parents? Or should parents retain the right to force their religious beliefs upon their children, even when those beliefs are demonstrably harmful to the education of the child, as is the case with teaching creationism, or even teaching kids a woman's role according to islam? And what about religious schools, as well as homeschoolers, engaged in the explicit task of indoctrinating children? How does society protect children from the damaging excesses of religion? How does society defend a child’s right to a proper education, even if that education violates the sincerely held religious beliefs of their parents?[/quote] Opinions?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Belief systems are a bit forced upon family. Yet ultimately it is up to the individual to determine what they believe. My family for example: Family of 6,3 guys, 3 girls. Parents were Episcopalian Christians and as such me,my brother and my 2 sisters all had to go to church. We weren't given a choice on it. Yet now I'm an atheist, my brother jewish, one of my sisters is pagan/her own belief and the other a mix of all I think, while the parents stayed Christian. I feel bad for those whose families were not accepting though. We all were forced into Christian belief, yet all came out of it. Ultimately it is up to tbe individual, but perhaps some protection does need to be in place. I doubt it would work or even have a chance of being supported, but what I think would be fair to the children themselves is to forbid religious exposure until a certain age,then introduce them to the world of it,and let them make their own choice. Parents would most likely scream bloody murder,and it'd be understandable. It is often taken that children can't make decisions for themselves,and I think this would probably fall under that category too at the same time as above. I mean, a child of a divorced family cant decide who they want to live with until theyre 14, and at 16 can only get married with parental consent.(At least here.) It does feel trickery and perhaps impossible to balance the child's right to believe what they want, free of their parents, with a parents right to raise their children. I really don't know. Not quite a fun thing either way.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    2 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon