{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by yoshi:
2/22/2015 10:39:57 PM
53
USA and ISIS
What are your thoughts on usa sending troops over to fight ISIS?
-
7 RepliesLet middle eastern stable governments / UN forces deal with it. Unless we're going to take them over and declare them a territory.
-
2 RepliesGet the armies of the countries they inhabit to fight them. Or launch a shock and awe campaign of overblown response to deal with them quickly to use them as an example showing other insurgencies how insignificant they actually are compared to military force and they actually only exist as much as the United States World Police allows them to.
-
Kill them all then randomly select some, cut off their heads and burn one of them alive. :)
-
2 RepliesI think we should leave them alone and If they do something really bad then go in
-
14 RepliesWell considering the USA Trained and funded ISIS and then turned them loose I'm having a big laugh at people who are like [i]WE NEEDZ TO STAHP DEM TURRISTS FUR FREEDOMZZZ USA USA USA[/i]
-
5 RepliesI like the current strategy of bombing the absolute shit out of them We just need more bombs and less discretion
-
Just get it over with. Finish the fight the Crusaders started over 1000 years ago.
-
13 RepliesEdited by PureBeast72: 2/23/2015 2:43:39 PMISIS can't handle a plastic gun's recoil Edit: Oh and USA are assholes, if they tend to attack ISIS they will hurt more innocent people "by mistake".
-
11 RepliesHmmm. Well if the -blam!-ing senate keeps cutting the military budget I say no. The military is getting stretched too thin.
-
1 ReplyNot as an occupying force, no. More troops do need to be sent for a wider advising role, as well as a larger supportive role. We desperately need to send Joint terminal attack controllers (JTAC's) to be embedded with Iraqi Security Forces (ISF). One reason why there are so few airstrikes in Iraq is because of a lack of current intelligence on targets. JTACs would cut down on that. More offensive Special Operations Forces need to be sent too in order to conduct more offensive operations against IS leadership or other HVT's. But as an analyst, I (and DB5 for that matter) can tell you that no progress will be made unless the ISF can actually retake and hold onto retaken ground. This is the real test.
-
ISIS : America are fukbois America : uWotM8?! I'll 'av yah I swear on me mum
-
i vote for neither .. instead ... a world wide org created by all countries against isis which will vet fighters to fight against isis the usa's reputation is to much of a toxic thing for the situation
-
5 RepliesUSA will get rekt, and going there will not solve any problems. I don't wanna see young men and women dying for nothing, hopefully the US doesn't send troops.
-
It's a great spy organization, they might be a little goofy but I'll take them over ODIN any day. US should definitely give them a contract.
-
1 ReplyBad idea. In fact very stupid idea. But we need to take better care at unifying the groups to fight against them instead of playing the politics game. Either way ISIS needs to be dismantled and its leaders subjected to whatever laws of the legitimate government of Iraq.
-
Only to kill as many of them and break as much of their stuff as possible. Not to occupy.
-
1 ReplyEdited by DB5: 2/28/2015 8:07:38 PMBad idea. Really bad idea. Didn't work with 150k+ troops. Won't work now
-
1 ReplyEdited by PuppyDuckMSB: 3/25/2015 8:47:54 PMI think probably no but I am not sure, these guys are totally crazy (from our POV) and they scare the hell out of me! Normally I would say we shouldn't go to war unless we get literally invaded or heavily bombed or things like that. I guess I would take a wait and see approach and try to figure out how big a threat they pose. I don't think it's our job to beat the bad guys everywhere or even to judge who is or isn't a bad person, to me it's just really about whether they are going to kill us. (Not whether they WANT to kill us but whether they actually will and this is what I'm not sure about in the case of ISIS). My judgment is clouded in this case by the whole slave market -blam!- thing, that is probably scarier to me even than the idea of someone bombing my town or something.
-
Hurry and do it.
-
Personally I think military corporations will start to rise to profit off of "terrorist" groups. Think about this ISIS is trying to poke a bear and the bear won't budge. Eventually the bear will fight back and become involved into a potlitical war because it was in another country. What will happen is USA will contract mercenaries to wipe ISIS out from the top down. And thus creating a never ending cycle of war profiteering
-
1 ReplyDevelop goat aids so they'll catch it with every goat they -blam!-. At expense of the goats of course
-
2 RepliesSit back until ISIS screws with more countries then make an alliance with all countries they messed with and then slowly insert penis into ISIS.
-
2 RepliesLeave ISIS alone. They didn't do anything to us.
-
ALLAHU AKBAR
-
burn them
-
ISIS needs to die.
