{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/3/2012 12:54:45 AM
52
Did Bungie mean to end the Halo series with Halo 3?
Let me elaborate. I'm wondering if Bungie meant for the Halo 3 ending to be the true ending to the Halo series, that 343's Halo games would mean nothing. Did Bungie leave the Halo 3 ending unexplained so that 343 could continue it, or did they do it to bring the "true" Halo story to a close that was up for interpretation? Will Bungie consider the next Halo games to be true Halo?
I've been wondering what Bungie thinks of 343 continuing the series, that is unless Bungie meant to close the Halo story with the third installment.
Uh...discuss where you think 343 is going with the next Halo games.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ICanHazRecon911 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] SonicJohn I think Bungie wanted to leave the Chief drifting in space. I have a feeling the legendary ending was added as a recommendation (demand?) from Microsoft. Who knows. I still like that Bungie did a great job of self-containing their Halo games to work completely outside of Microsoft's story.[/quote] I was kind of thinking that too... It seems like the most plausible answer.[/quote] I doubt it as the legendary ending was also hinted at in the legendary terminals in Halo 3 when MB talks about making amends and sending you to his makers so that they know he tried to right what he originally wronged, or something along those lines.
