{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/21/2012 2:01:00 AM
62
How the new armor (while is cool) needs an explanation.
First off it's been revealed that the Chief's newest armor is just the Mark VI but with FIRMWARE upgrades. Firmware can not mean the whole armor plating was changed as well.
While I was never a big fan of the traditional Mark VI, there just needs to be an actual explanation for the change in look, not ARTISTIC LICENSE.
To me this would mean that if a Halo 2 Anniversary is made, the Chief would not be wearing his famous Mark VI look but instead the new armor.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] B1ackBe1tGamer I was actually really upset about that when I saw the trailer simply because it is supposed to start off right after the end of Halo 3, right? Therefore, where did Chief change his armor? Firmware upgrades I can MAYBE accept, possibly uploaded to him while he was in cryosleep. But to have entirely new armor visually too? AND to have pulled a jetpack out of his ass? No. Unacceptable IMO.[/quote] I agree. I can accept just the 343's perspective of wanting to change chief, but even if it's just "scifi" it would make sense to explain how he changes armor, you can't just perform that in cryo.
