I personally think bungies story makes more sense than 343's
English
#Gaming
-
Well, 343 is practically bungie, more people from the 2001 bungie are at 343 now than still at bungie, and you can really tell from there new work, it's atrocious.
-
Can you make this a poll, it would really be more noticed!
-
343i story makes sense. Bungie's stories had more holes than the moon.
-
Bungies story was made to be easily understandable. But when you look at it, it was quite shallow. It was always a clear black and white fight. 343 is trying to add more depth and character development, pulling from sources outside of the games. Now, because of that many halo fans didn't understand what was going on in Halo 4, leading to the misconception that 343 made a bad story, when in fact it was IMO the best out of all of them because of how much info they put in it.
-
-
Bungie. The Workplace wasn't created under 343i work was it now?
-
Well Idk alot of the people from Bungie stayed behind with 343. My favorite Halo game so far was Halo Reach and that was Bungie and 343. Can't say who's better but one thing I like about 343 is that they do a better job of making master chief an in depth character. In the first 3 Bungie Halo games the chief is just so... bland. I think Halo 5 is going to be badass. What they're already doing with the new characters and Halo Nightfall has me really excited.
-
Halo 4 beats the Bungie games for graphics. But I did prefer the story arc of 1-3. Guess I'll have to see how halo 5 plays out.
-
That's because Halo's 1-3 were about the immediate universe introduced [i]in[/i] the games. The story that 343i is laying down relies much more on non-game pieces to understand the exposition and context, that's why you get things like [i]Forward Unto Dawn, Halo: Nightfall,[/i] all the books, and all the graphic novels.
-
Bungie by far. Just take Halo 3 vs. Halo 4... Halo 3 wiped the floor with 4
-
The one where I'm not a -blam!-ing pussy who takes orders from a dumb bitch and a douchefag [spoiler]Bungie[/spoiler]
-
Gonna have to wait on my conclusion until 343i has made more than 1/6 of the games that Bungie made :P [spoiler]Halo Wars, blah blah yeah yeah I know[/spoiler]
-
343i hasn't released enough games to be compared to Bungie just yet.
-
Bungie you idgits!
-
343 is better with the affects but bungie as a better story to tell.
-
Well considering the only semi-original idea 343 had was terrible, gotta go with Bungie
-
I would find this hard to vote on if 343 hadn't given that bull ending at halo 4... Seriously a freaking two button quick time event to kill the big enemy of the whole game?
-
Bungie of course.
-
Bungie.
-
Well, Bungie at least managed to get their Halo games out in working order...
-
Bungie hands Down
-
Well 343 have only made one original game so we can't really decide yet
-
343 hasn't released enough content to really be compared to bungie yet. I thought halo 4 had a fresh story and fleshed out MC as a person. Halo 1-2-3-odst-reach was masterful. My personal favorite was halo 3. Very serious air to it, plus the flood and an arbiter ally
-
I dont know how people can even consider 343i.. Has anyone noticed that multiplayer still doesnt work around 45 days after release
-
Edited by Unyielding: 12/23/2014 12:33:00 AMI don't think we have enough games released on 343's side to judge yet.
-
Bungie did better, but you don't know how good or bad they would do with Halo 4. Probably bad if you see what Destiny has become. :p I mean, I still liked Reach a lot. :3