{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/17/2014 4:20:19 PM
7
Ive played them both,
Ive played them both, but ive been recently wanting to play fallout alot latley, should i get 3 or new vegas. I like new vegas play and story but it was just so quick to finish. As far as fallout 3 i didnt get into it as much but it had so much more to do
English
#Gaming
-
They are both good but I always felt like Fallout 3 had more to offer and was better.
-
2 RepliesSo I know fallout is popular but I just couldn't get into it, I've tried 3 and new Vegas so many times and end up giving in after a few hours, maybe I just prefer magic and bows to guns
-
1 ReplyEdited by Phehom: 12/17/2014 4:38:53 PMGet 3 Imo its way better :) way more stuff to do
-
Fallout 3 > Fallout: New Vegas
-
3 RepliesNo brainer. FO 3 doesn't have to end when you beat it. NV rolls credits, game over. The DLC for NV is pure shit, Sierra Madre was one of the worst DLC's I have ever seen for any game.
-
Edited by Liberator 2033: 12/17/2014 10:40:08 PMDefinetly Fallout 3. Just actually look for the first city BEFORE you explore. I spent so much game time hiding with about ten percent health every day (in game time) relying on beds to sleep in so I could have my full health in the morning. Running into a Fire Ant or Hirelurk nest is the worst when you're only level five.
-
3 RepliesGet 3. Its better. [spoiler]flamesuit on [/spoiler]
