I'm going to draw a few points that map out the correlation between a universe that was internally disrupted from it's natural state of being by an unknown variable, which could very well had been the control variable the whole time, to what is politically acceptable as a Darwinist or secularist, but most are know as atheists. Here is the scenario: The universe was a singularity before it's expansion and will continue expanding, or it will collapse. It's stability rested upon the distinct segregation of space, time, and consciousness(limited list, I know). All factors(not listed above) were controls in the singularity, for how would it remain so if it weren't, and how would the singularity come to be if it were created the instant prior to expansion? An internal control became an external variable by setting this expansion in motion. The atheist was salty before their decision to live solely based on facts, and remains salty to this day, for if the atheist loves or forgives (which would disrupt their natural state of being), it will, to them be a demise, but in actuality will cause great expansion. An internal factor (the ability to love and forgive) must become an external variable(carrying out of said actions) in order to set it's expansion in motion. Prove me wrong. [spoiler]I've had my fair share of sodium too.[/spoiler]