{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/25/2014 7:51:11 PM
49
did man really go to the moon
One of the worlds greatest ever conspiracy theory's. Did we or was it all Hollywood magic produced by NASA. If like to think that we did an monumental achievement of the human race but due to the technology of the day it is doubtful
One way to settle the argument for good point the Hubble telescope at the sea of tranquility and let the public look for themselves and that will put the argument to bed for good and confirm buzz aldrinz and Neil armstrongs status as Herod of the human race forever
English
#Offtopic
-
Edited by ANGRY ASIAN 500: 10/25/2014 11:50:44 PMInteresting fact the sun bleached all the color from the flag we put there so we're preemptively surrendering to any aliens that pass by the moon.
-
3 RepliesYes. Only tin foilers disagree. Inb4 Tin foilers Inb4 muh legit theories!! Inb4 no proof!
-
4 RepliesThe moon is a hologram set up by the government, it doesn't even exist.
-
1 ReplyShhh. NSA is watching...
-
3 RepliesA better question would be where are the Roswell aliens.
-
Or, did the moon come to us?
-
It was all a lie there is no space The matrix was no movie it was the truth
-
1 ReplyIt's quite ironic, but the technology to [i]fake[/i] the moon landing wouldn't have existed for a good decade or so after the landing took place.
-
3 Replies>All these people voting yes Kek, wake up people.
-
No but da whizerd came from der
-
inb4 NASA fakes the Mars landing
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1hKSYgOGtos
-
14 RepliesYou really are into conspiracy theories.
-
Edited by Mars3099: 10/26/2014 6:39:52 AMdid we land on the moon? well OF COURSE WE DID it is in so many history books it would just not make since if we did not plus we had the tech at the time so it makes sense that we did..... Now the real question is if the [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] had a base on the moon?????
-
2 Replies>does not understand topic >believes conspiracy theories regarding topic >posts about topic >???? >World War III
-
Even those who think the initial landing was false, they do believe that man eventually DID go to the moon later. So, regardless of when it happened, yes. Of course, I don't doubt the initial moon landing so...
-
I'm not going to deny countless hours of tape proving it.
-
1 ReplyI think the most important question is actually why didn't they tell us about the Hive?
-
3 RepliesI'm reasonably sure you can see our landing equipment on the surface of the Moon with a telescope of sufficient strength.
-
It saddens me that people actually think we didn't
-
The rocket went up, and it is really hard to hide a rocket. It went where the moon would be in three days, and came back at exactly the correct time. In the ocean.
-
Edited by kj2177: 10/26/2014 1:42:40 AM[quote]One way to settle the argument for good point the Hubble telescope at the sea of tranquility and let the public look for themselves and that will put the argument to bed for good and confirm buzz aldrinz and Neil armstrongs status as Herod of the human race forever[/quote] an entire video of the event was not enough to convince people and you think that would? there will always be naysayers. and other governments would have more of a vested interest than conspiracists in america to prove it didn't happen. at any rate, it just doesn't make sense. if these guys didn't go to the moon, and yet most of them have said they saw UFOs, why stir the pot? if it was all scripted in some hollywood studio, why say that they saw unexplainable things as well? it is sad to me that someone like buzz aldrin or neil armstrong can sacrifice so much for science and global accomplishment, and yet be greeted with people that believe it didn't happen. but in all seriousness, i pity those that have such a hard time touching base with reality because they are truly missing the celebration of some of the most extraordinary feats in history. just my opinion...
-
Edited by JonnyC0mbat: 10/26/2014 2:01:15 AMThe hundreds of hours of video footage from multiple trips says they did. Why anyone thinks it was a hoax escapes me. They also left a reflector on the surface to measure the drift each year
-
Using the Hubble to point to the Flag would be useless because of Solar Wind that is constantly given off by Sol which would corrode the Flag to space dust over the years.[spoiler]the more you know[/spoiler]
-
Yes, yes we did[spoiler]That's what they want you to think, in reality, the illuminati have tricked us once again! So many lost souls....[/spoiler]
-
22 RepliesEdited by DE4THINC4RN4TE: 10/25/2014 9:27:00 PM[quote]One of the world's stupidest ever conspiracy theory's to think we didn't. It was a technological marvel produced by NASA. It was a monumental achievement of the human race but due to the technology of the day it is even more impressive.[/quote] FTFY It was incredibly advanced for the day because the most powerful nation and it's people were strongly rallying behind it. You honestly think entities like the USSR wouldn't have called us out if it was fake? This was the middle of the Cold War. They would have loved to do this. [quote]One way to settle the argument for good point the Hubble telescope at the sea of tranquility and let the public look for themselves and that will put the argument to bed for good and confirm buzz aldrinz and Neil armstrongs status as Herod of the human race forever[/quote] That wouldn't even come remotely close to working. The Hubble is much too small to see something like that. "But dey can c other galaxies u r stuped DE4TH." Look up something called Arc Seconds. It's a math term that gets used in Astronomy a lot. It can be used as a measure of how big things appear to us. The image of a galaxy is much bigger than the image of Apollo Missions. The reason we can't see the galaxies (and whatever else) is because they are too faint. That's where Hubble comes in. Just saying point Hubble at the Moon is ridiculous. It would never work. From what I've heard, the smallest thing the Hubble could discern on the Moon's surface would be the size of a football stadium. And even then, that would be the Telescope equivalent of that stadium being a single pixel on the screen.
