There seem to be two major theories currently.
The theory that the vast majority of people have naturally come to accept because it's the most sensible from a simplified and personal perspective is that time is constantly flowing in all places continuously ― beginning to end.
The less known and accepted theory is that every point in time exists simultaneously. To understand this, one can compare the universe to a DVD, Blu-Ray, etc. Any and all points within the movie exist on that disc simultaneously. It's simply a matter or rewinding or fast-forwarding to reach that point, and yet it moves in a coherent path on its own.
What is your view on the subject?
[spoiler]I'm writing a paper on this for my English Composition course in university. Could anyone provide links to good articles representing both sides of this debate?[/spoiler][spoiler]inb4[b]few[/b]replies[b]because[/b]stupid[b]people[/b]
inb4[b]religion[/b]versus[b]atheism[/b]
inb4[b]op[/b]is[b]imposter[/b]
inb4[b]op[/b]cant[b]inb4[/b][/spoiler]
-
In feel like time is just a concept created by man. Like cars or science. Yes, if we didn't have clocks days would still go by but we didn't know what it was before. We thought it an easy thing. Over time, time earned a few names.... The greatest enemy. Its just like cars, meant to improve life.