{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Babyrancher:
8/15/2014 6:07:02 PM
185
Should Bungie Have Sacrificed People On Last Gen Systems?
Last gen held us back to 30 frames per second.
If Bungie had left them behind for Destiny we could have had 60 fps on a PS4/Xbone exclusive. That's not even touching on the idea that time spent on the PS3/360 version could have been further applied to a better next gen version.
Should Bungie have sacrificed people on last gen systems in the interest of making Destiny the best it could be?
Update: Don't shoot the guy asking the question. The numbers don't lie, and they show the community is pretty evenly split on this one.
-
Edited by Soaringeagle61: 8/18/2014 12:58:35 AMMy problem is not the fps because I thought it looked fine! But rather the non definitive movement towards the next gen. Which in that case bungie definitely isn't the only one guilty of that. We have people still making games just for last gen. So again just not definitive and quick enough of a transfer for me. That being said, again I thought destiny was beautiful and flowed just fine!
