{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/20/2012 1:13:02 AM
67
If Halo 4 has a great ranking system.....
along with even starts (Halo 3 and Halo 2)for those playlist that use the Ranking system, Halo 4 will be the most populated game of all time.
Halo 3 had a great 1-50 system, but Social Slayer was boring after you played a lot of games, because there wasn't many unlocks.
Now if Halo 4 has a great ranking system that is around 1-50's level, it also has a great casual system (Initial System + 8 other systems in which you get a ton of other unlocks that will drive casual minds crazy in joy)
Also, add that to Spartan Ops for the campaign lovers, and you get a very populated game. 5 NEW missions a week + Awesome Unlocks and Specialized Branches + Set loadouts for ranked playlist for a great Ranking System = Success for everyone
[Edited on 08.19.2012 5:44 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] FlintyFlame67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] mojeda101 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] FlintyFlame67 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] mojeda101 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] FlintyFlame67 A ranking system is ALWAYS based on skill. [/quote]Reach did so well with that didn't it?[/quote] That was a damn progression system. The ranking system was Arena. Arena was a fail though[/quote]It wouldn't really matter if rank is invisible, would it? [/quote] What are you on about? A progression system is based on EXP A ranking system is based on Skill The progression system in Reach was the ranks you got in multiplayer The ranking system was Arena [/quote]I'm not talking about that. Did you not see that tweet a few days ago saying that the ranking system was invisible? It might not have been a tweet, but I remember people were complaining about it.
