NOTE: I read the rules. This isn't political, as I'm not taking any side of a political party.
If this gets out of hand, however, I will close the thread, and erase the OP.
Calmly state your standpoint, why you have that standpoint, and respectfully listen/disagree with someone else's.
The -blam!- filter should not be breached, and there should be no hurt feelings from this thread. I merely want to know the Flood's standpoint on the matter.
I personally am strongly for it.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with it, and I haven't so much as glanced at the chick-fil-a since it was discovered they gave money to anti--blam!--blam!- organizations.
Love is love.
And if Chick-fil-a can say their opinion, and discriminate against -blam!--blam!-s, I can say my opinion and not eat there.
OP Lives in Dallas BTW
[Edited on 08.11.2012 12:03 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] shadow 2648 Then as I have said please feel free to cite the gene and the source of the finding. Because you know straight people only have straight children and blam couples only have blam children ( forgive the sarcasm ) [/quote] That's not really how it works. There's been a study that the more male kids parents have, the more likely that they'll be homo-blam!-. However that's not a necessary prerequisite. Some people just develop that way. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mister Donut If that is your logic, you must be against people with physical deformities getting married as well. You don't agree with people with any sort of deformity, mentally or physically, getting married. That must be it, correct? Do you agree with somebody with six fingers on one hand getting married? Why, or why not?[/quote] Not necessarily. I don't think people with certain deformities should have certain rights.