{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/14/2012 1:37:26 AM
52
Why didn't they use the MP chief armor?
I mean they could have at the very beginning at the least and then changed it when he found infinity. The multiplayer Mark VI armor is far more similar to the Halo 3 model than what was forced upon us in the campaign.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Crazy LlamaX [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] flamedude I don't get why they redesigned his armor TWICE. Halo 4 has two sets of Mk VI, and the worst thing about it is that the Chief apparently retires his Mk VI at the end of the game. So we don't get the classic armor at all in H4 and we never will again. Bravo 343i.[/quote] They would have to make a completely different model for it, doesn't seem worth it for one set of armor. [/quote] You do realise that you get Mk VI for completing H4 on Legendary right? My point is that the Mk VI you get is another redesign of the Chiefs classic armor from H3. So you have the nanobot Mk VI that the Chief wears in Campaign and you get redesigned Mk VI that your S-IV wears in Multiplayer. They redesigned the Mk VI twice. They couldn't even give us something untouched except for the helmet and I can imagine 343i arguing over that.
