{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/27/2012 6:19:50 AM
80
Rapist asks for visitation rights for the child of his victim
[url=http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/19628763/2012/09/24/rapist-wants-visitation-rights-teen-mom-fighting-back]And he might just get it[/url].
Essentially, guy rapes underage girl, girl gets pregnant and chooses not to do abortion, child gets born, rapist is ordered by a judge to do child support in exchange for 16 years probation, which causes a problem as, in MA, if you pay for child support, you can get visitation rights.
[Edited on 09.26.2012 10:29 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Doc Bacon [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MadMax888 But if she did not consent, he would not have been charged with statutory -blam!-. He would be charged with....regular -blam!-.[/quote] What makes you think that? To my knowledge even if he did -blam!- her he still would have been charged with statutory -blam!-.[/quote] Well... thats not how it works. Its statutory if consensual, normal if not. Since it was statutory, it was consensual, that is what statutory -blam!- means[/quote] That's incorrect. Statutory -blam!- just means one of the participants was under the age of consent. Violent, non-consensual sex can still be considered statutory -blam!- (if the victim is under the age of consent) - it's just not as common. [Edited on 09.26.2012 11:48 PM PDT]
