{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/21/2012 10:41:42 PM
69
343i has balls, Bungie does not
I've been pretty skeptical about Halo 4 ever since it was announced, but now I'm convinced the Halo franchise is in good hands.
343 has added more to Halo 4 than all the Halo games combined. (that was an exaggeration). They are, however, taking risks with all the new features they are adding. What has struck me most is the new infection gametype. I've always wondered: Why doesn't Bungie just add REAL infection mode? It's because they take the safe route and they are uncertain of their decisions.
Halo Reach, for example, was (in MY opinion and many others) a disappointment. It seemed like Bungie wanted to add new features, but they were scared to go too far. Armor Abilities and Bloom are not terrible, but I have always felt that it was never their true intention to add those features. The whole game felt... it just didn't feel like something Bungie would do. Halo Reach was bad because it was moderate.
Bungie, don't disappoint me anymore.
[Edited on 09.21.2012 2:43 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darkside Eric [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Gen Petitt [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darkside Eric [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Gen Petitt Been done before and also one word ruins it for me MMO there you go. Hate these play monthly to play games they are never worth it.[/quote] Because all MMOs are subscription based, right?[/quote] Every single one put out by Activision Blizzard[/quote] So... just the what, one then?[/quote] *facepalm* WOW, Diablo all of there modern ones and they are not that good even. What makes you think a this is an excepttion it is their trend for their games they try and rip you off.
