[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darkside Eric [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Gen Petitt [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darkside Eric [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] P3P5I [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Darkside Eric The [i]idea[/i] of change is not always good, you don't ever have to get to implication in the final product to see that.[/quote]His definition is a bit weird. I'm seeing it like: given a copy paste sequel that is already good compared to a change to the gameplay that is also good, people are going to like the change better because it is fresh, which I think we can all agree with. So I agree with both of you.[/quote] This is a no brainer. But how he presents his side has been idiotic so far. Change itself, just the "idea" of it, is not inherently good, which is what he has been saying.[/quote] [b]The idea[u] for the most part [/u]is always good,[/b] it is implication that is causes it to be bad. Many things in Goverment prove that statement to be true, a modern example was NAFTA good in theory not in implication.[/quote] Why do you continue being wrong? If I have the "idea" to change my diet to eating nothing but glass, I don't have to put it into practice to probably know it's a terrible idea.[/quote] I underlined the fine print for you. Want reading glasses too?