{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/5/2013 11:36:40 PM
162
Halo 4 or Halo Reach
Halo Reach has a much higher skill gap compared to 4.. but it's still Reach. At least I can play Reach for more than 2 games unlike Halo 4.
Which do you prefer and why? Which is better and why?
-
I always enjoyed Reach. Halo 4 is just atrocious in all aspects. Campaign is definitely the weakest in the series. The outsourced aspects of the campaign just prove that they really didn't care much. (Old spartans using new Mark VI/Mark VII?) Chief's massive growth spurt in the final cutscene, cheesy ending, short campaign, I could go on. And the thing was, the campaign was short and easy even WITH all of the artificial longevity added to it. Most of the -blam!- could have been cut out. Like, most of the time when playing, I was saying to myself, "I did this already...I did this twice already." [Edited on 01.05.2013 9:32 PM PST]
