Halo Reach has a much higher skill gap compared to 4.. but it's still Reach. At least I can play Reach for more than 2 games unlike Halo 4.
Which do you prefer and why? Which is better and why?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] You Know Already [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] TH3_AV3NG3R You don't have to aim in Halo 4 at all. The auto aim and bullet magnetism did it for you not only that but the reticule doesn't have to be red it order for you to get the kill.[/quote] Not what I meant, bloom made it so you didn't have to aim and punished those that tried. Also, the last part of your post has seriously been toned down and almost never happens to me anymore, and don't even try to say killcam is proof because we all know killcam doesn't actually work in the game. Also, the aim assist was worse in Reach.[/quote] Last part of my post tone down? [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWaDwsGb1c0] The hitbox.[/url] Aim assist is the same as Reach's. The sniper, the indicator is still red at a longer range than the Reach sniper when no scoping. Lol. In fact, it is hard to miss a no scope with a sniper in Halo 4. I would feel really bad if anyone did here. The game already punishes people in Halo 4 because you don't have to aim just like Reach. Sucks. They still didn't learn from the outcry. They still put bloom in the game. Day 1 feature killcam is broken. lol343 Day 1 file browser is broken. lol343 What is the point of showing off things at video game conventions if they don't work in the actual game? [Edited on 01.05.2013 8:49 PM PST]