{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/6/2012 3:45:27 PM
25
OMG Star Trek: Into Darkness trailer!!!!!
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSoIs4wfaeM]Official Teaser Trailer![/url]
I'm excited!!! Thoughts?
-
Benedict Cumberbatch is looking sexy as always, I might see this.
-
It's already been 4 years!? 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years :O
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Carthurlane It's already been 4 years!? 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years 4 years :O[/quote] (._.)
-
theres a thread on this already made thats on the front page
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BuzzKill9009 theres a thread on this already made thats on the front page[/quote] Go look at the post times.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BuzzKill9009 theres a thread on this already made thats on the front page[/quote] Nah this OP made it before me. I just don't really care to change it after I noticed he was first.
-
Lens Flare the Movie: Part II But seriously. Benedict Cumberbatch. In Star Trek. Sweet babby jesus.
-
Looks fantastic!
-
Half way through watching Next Generation now, and I want a Picard movie, not Kirk.
-
jizzd
-
Can't wait !!!
-
Looks like the villain is going to be Lt. Commander Gary Mitchell from the TOS pilot "where know man has gone before". As for the themes, I don't know if the whole dark intense thing is something Star Trek should be doing. I always felt it was more about the logic and hope for the future that defined Star Trek.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 As for the themes, I don't know if the whole dark intense thing is something Star Trek should be doing. I always felt it was more about the logic and hope for the future that defined Star Trek.[/quote] THANK you. The problem with Abrams' Star Trek films isn't that they're bad movies, per say - it's that they aren't true to the themes and messages of Star Trek.
-
That ship that rose out of the water. All I could read of the name was "Nor." Confirmed: Shepard found his way into Star Trek. The real ending of Mass Effect was never what you saw in the game...
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Obi Wan Stevobi Half way through watching Next Generation now, and I want a Picard movie, not Kirk.[/quote] Picard has two or three movies, though... Or do you mean next-gen movies?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] xXIHAYD0IXx That ship that rose out of the water. All I could read of the name was "Nor." Confirmed: Shepard found his way into Star Trek. The real ending of Mass Effect was never what you saw in the game...[/quote] My whole life was a lie... OT: really excited for this.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Xizor14 Lens Flare the Movie: Part II[/quote]That annoyed me as well, but I still loved the first one!!
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 Looks like the villain is going to be Lt. Commander Gary Mitchell from the TOS pilot "where know man has gone before". [/quote]I've seen Khan bounced around as the villain, but actually, that makes much more sense.
-
...old. This is the second one today. But still, i'm excited.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] AR IS4 NUBS ...old. This is the second one today. But still, i'm excited.[/quote]Um, this was actually the first, check the time posted.
-
I doubt he's Khan because Cumberbatch would have a hell of a time pulling off the "genetically superior human" look, and he's seen wearing a Starfleet uniform. I see no reason why they wouldn't just make up a villain like they did in '09.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] CND AAA Beef [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 Looks like the villain is going to be Lt. Commander Gary Mitchell from the TOS pilot "where know man has gone before". [/quote]I've seen Khan bounced around as the villain, but actually, that makes much more sense.[/quote] He apparently died in the tie in comics. And I think Khan would better fit the whole "vengance" thing. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Not The Joker [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 As for the themes, I don't know if the whole dark intense thing is something Star Trek should be doing. I always felt it was more about the logic and hope for the future that defined Star Trek.[/quote] THANK you. The problem with Abrams' Star Trek films isn't that they're bad movies, per say - it's that they aren't true to the themes and messages of Star Trek.[/quote] That's because they're not trying to be the original. In the same way people recommend the redlettermedia reviews for the Prequels, I'd recommend their review for Star Trek 2009. He basically says that the way Abrams is doing Trek is the only way for Trek to have survived in modern cinema. They're still true to the characters and the setting, and are still good movies. I think that's all that is needed.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] deltahalo UK jizzd[/quote]
-
Mass Eff... Oh Star Trek Yeah ! The first one was cool, i hope this one will be better with a true bad guy, cause Bana was meh...
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ROBERTO jh [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] CND AAA Beef [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 Looks like the villain is going to be Lt. Commander Gary Mitchell from the TOS pilot "where know man has gone before". [/quote]I've seen Khan bounced around as the villain, but actually, that makes much more sense.[/quote] He apparently died in the tie in comics. And I think Khan would better fit the whole "vengance" thing. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Not The Joker [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Th3 Gr3at Dan3 As for the themes, I don't know if the whole dark intense thing is something Star Trek should be doing. I always felt it was more about the logic and hope for the future that defined Star Trek.[/quote] THANK you. The problem with Abrams' Star Trek films isn't that they're bad movies, per say - it's that they aren't true to the themes and messages of Star Trek.[/quote] That's because they're not trying to be the original. In the same way people recommend the redlettermedia reviews for the Prequels, I'd recommend their review for Star Trek 2009. He basically says that the way Abrams is doing Trek is the only way for Trek to have survived in modern cinema. They're still true to the characters and the setting, and are still good movies. I think that's all that is needed.[/quote] I watched the redlettermedia, and I understood that point, and fully agreed with him. I like my star trek when it is either complete action or complete boring logic. I prefer the logic side myself, but I am fine with the new version.
