{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/2/2011 6:21:32 AM
216
Proof that 2 + 2 = 5
Start with: -20 = -20
Which is the same as: 16-36 = 25-45
Which can also be expressed as: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5
Add 81/4 to both sides: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) + 81/4 = 52) 9 X 5 + 81/4
Rearrange the terms: ({2+2}) 9/2) 2 = (5-9/2) 2
Ergo: 2+2 - 9/2 = 5
Hence: 2 + 2 = 5
This was calculated in Gaelic BTW.
[Edited on 09.01.2011 10:31 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] An Eagle Goose 2+2=22 you dum hads.[/quote] 2 2's make 22! I WIN!
-
2+2=22 you dum hads.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] n00b4life95 Start with: -20 = -20 Which is the same as: 16-36 = 25-45 Which can also be expressed as: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5 Add 81/4 to both sides: [u][b](2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) + 81/4 = 52) 9 X 5 + 81/4[/b][/u] Rearrange the terms: ({2+2}) 9/2) 2 = (5-9/2) 2 Ergo: 2+2 - 9/2 = 5 Hence: 2 + 2 = 5 This was calculated in Gaelic BTW.[/quote]Your equation is incorrect, please review the one I underlined/bold.
-
I can still count with my fingers, 2+2 and i can only see 4
-
Now explain to me how you think posting your awesome findings on a bungie forum will help.
-
Oh my god.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] KamikaZeGecko21 it doesn't[/quote]
-
I don't understand the third line at all. The equals sign inside brackets? MADNESS!
-
2+2=4 idiot. Your so dumb if I kicked you in the ass your nose would start bleeding.
-
OP -blam!- up on the balancing part.
-
To complicated didnt read.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] n00b4life95 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] IBlazin PhoenixI 2+2=fish Dumbass.[/quote] If 2 + 2 = fish then 4 + 4 = Giraffe. [/quote] 2 fish = giraffe
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Disambiguation [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BF117HALO Lamp+Gorilla=Cardboard?[/quote]I would conjecture that lamp + gorilla = monkey. This, obviously, implies that 2(lamp + gorilla) = salamander. Although I am still hashing out the details of a proof.[/quote] I think lamp + gorilla = chimp. PROOF: As everyone knows lamps emit LIGHT Now what is a chimp but a LIGHTER (less heavy) version of a gorilla?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Disambiguation [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BF117HALO Lamp+Gorilla=Cardboard?[/quote]I would conjecture that lamp + gorilla = monkey. This, obviously, implies that 2(lamp + gorilla) = salamander. Although I am still hashing out the details of a proof.[/quote] You forgot to key in the fact that in order to have salamander you need have at least 2^xmaple leaf. Common mistake [Edited on 09.02.2011 2:02 AM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] BF117HALO Lamp+Gorilla=Cardboard?[/quote]I would conjecture that lamp + gorilla = monkey. This, obviously, implies that 2(lamp + gorilla) = salamander. Although I am still hashing out the details of a proof.
-
Lamp+Gorilla=Cardboard?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] DrFetusFondler As I do recall, you were the original person who posted this thread. You posted a supposed explanation to how 2 + 2 could = 5, What did you expect to happen?[/quote] Well I didn't expect to get 7 pages and to be up at 5 am right now :/
-
As I do recall, you were the original person who posted this thread. You posted a supposed explanation to how 2 + 2 could = 5, What did you expect to happen?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] DrFetusFondler What an excellent rebuttal, it seems as if you have realized you have made a boo-boo and can't accept it. So instead of accepting that your explanation to the practicality of "2+2=5" is in fact wrong, you avoid the question by posting an unrelated and topic-changing picture. Well played.[/quote] No, I haven't made a "boo-boo" And wont accept it, its just that the thread has sort of leaned more on the jokes side. Then you got back on the mathematical matter. Its about 4 am for me so I rather be joking around than talking about math right now [Edited on 09.02.2011 1:48 AM PDT]
-
What an excellent rebuttal, it seems as if you have realized you have made a boo-boo and can't accept it. So instead of accepting that your explanation to the practicality of "2+2=5" is in fact wrong, you avoid the question by posting an unrelated and topic-changing picture. Well played.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bungie2 That is an inconsistent fallacy of an equation. Unless you are calculating to another logarithmic function? ~B2[/quote]I believe he is attempting to linearly interpolate (Frobenius' method?) the function into the Napier logarithmic function. ~D [Edited on 09.02.2011 1:42 AM PDT]
-
That is an inconsistent fallacy of an equation. Unless you are calculating to another logarithmic function? ~B2
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] TheMouthOfSauron [/quote]God damnit Sauron I can't stop laughing xD
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] IPhsYcoon 2+2 - 9/2 = 5 4-4.5 = 5 -0.5 = 5 That makes no sense. [/quote] It does if you understand it.
-
2+2 - 9/2 = 5 4-4.5 = 5 -0.5 = 5 That makes no sense.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] DrFetusFondler You seem to be arguing with many of these Forum-goers about whether or not your mathematical equation is correct. I'm not saying you are wrong nor am I saying your a right, I am simply stating that you showed no work and in many, if not all, mathematicians eyes, your answer would be considered incorrect. This is not a matter of opinion but of sheer fact. So in FACT your explanation (your equation) to whether or not 2 plus 2 equals 5 is wrong.[/quote] [url=http://www.google.com/imgres?q=serious+sloth&um=1&hl=en&client=opera&sa=N&rls=en&channel=suggest&biw=1366&bih=568&tbm=isch&tbnid=XfUO0yRRVeAjlM:&imgrefurl=http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1226709/Serious%2BSloth%2BBro/&docid=S26Hkg-meJe6zM&itg=1&w=259&h=194&ei=6pJgToKDD46gtwe-6d0R&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=420&vpy=119&dur=432&hovh=155&hovw=207&tx=105&ty=56&page=1&tbnh=135&tbnw=189&start=0&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0]This[/url]
