I can't believe this thread is still on the front page after 2 days...
Original Post:
Either than the fact that your squad on the Normandy gets stranded on a random planet and that the Mass Relays are destroyed, but I don't believe that those are legitimate reasons to call the whole ending awful.
Discuss the ending.
[Edited on 05.23.2012 4:02 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] xSapphire [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MyNameIsCharlie The difference is that no one asked Da Vinci to repaint the Mona Lisa because they thought they had been promised a better painting.[/quote] [url=http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/615759-mass-effect-3/62307752]Except Bioware DID promise a better ending.[/url] "Every decision you've made will impact how things go. The player's also the architect of what happens." "You'll get answers to everything. That was one of the key things. Regardless of how we did everything, we had to say, yes, we're going to provide some answers to these people." "Fans want to make sure that they see things resolved, they want to get some closure, a great ending. I think they're going to get that." "It's not even in any way like the traditional game endings, where you can say how many endings there are or whether you got ending A, B, or C.....The endings have a lot more sophistication and variety in them." In an inteview with NowGamer at Gamescom, we asked if BioWare was taking risks with Mass Effect 3's plot, including a negative ending in which the Reapers win. Gamble simply said, "Yes". We asked him again to confirm what he had just said and he said, "Yes". "Of course you don't have to play multiplayer, you can choose to play all the side-quests in single-player and do all that stuff you'll still get all the same endings and same information, it's just a totally different way of playing" "We have a rule in our franchise that there is no canon. You as a player decide what your story is." [/quote]So. Many. Lies.