{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Shadow Legion
9/4/2014 6:58:19 PM
26
Which shooter do you like more?
Just wanted to know about the clan members. Which shooter you are more comfortable with? Battlefield or Call of Duty? What do you mostly play? You have to choose one even if u think u like them both equally... :P For me it's Battlefield.
-
Both are slowly getting worse
-
-
1 ReplyThe 30% who voted CoD... Fgts.
-
1 ReplyThey both belong in the trash.
-
While I definitely enjoy battlefield more, it's gone mostly downhill ever since dice was bought out by EA. Bad company 2 was fine, but any battlefield vet will tell you the best battlefields were bf 2 and 1942.
-
Call of Duty all the way, HOORAH!!!
-
I prefer Call of Duty.
-
2 Replies[quote]Which bad game is less bad[/quote] Fix'd
-
Edited by DuuJ: 1/30/2015 4:16:50 PMPlayed both but spent more time on BF. It's more fun but more rage inducing. AW is good though.
-
Battlefield for multiplayer cod for zombies (specifically aw and bo)
-
2 RepliesOne of them is right and one of them is wrong
-
I'm better at cod but I like battlefield because I can mess around.😜
-
Li haven't played battlefield. But I assume it's better than cod
-
The only good battlefield game was 1942
-
-
Battlefield ftw!
-
Battlefield is now fixed
-
It would be super close for me but if i had to choose one it would probably be cod
-
Both series have had their moments. I am really a single player kind of gamer primarily, but I played the hell out of Battlefield 2 and 2142 despite not having a campaign. Then Battlefield 3 and 4 had single player, and while I have played both neither was particularly memorable, though the multiplayer for 3 in particular was pretty good. Then there's CoD. I've never really cared for the multiplayer but even though they are short there has been something memorable about at least one level in most, but definitely not all, of the games. In the end both series, to me, are like a guilty pleasure summer special effects movie. They look cool, they have some wow moments, but neither is really pushing games forward with story or innovation on a regular basis. I will play both of the upcoming sequels and try them out but unless I am wrong I will be back to Destiny in short order even then. Bioshock, Halo, even the craziness that is Borderlands, just to name a few off the top of my head, have proven that you can make a fun shooter with a good story and good gameplay, and so far none of those has turned into an annual series...wonder if there might be something to that...
-
both are bad just like you
-
I still play Battlefield 3 pretty often. Call of Duty used to fantastic but went to sh*t. At this point I only play with friends on occasion.
-
They're both money grabs for each sequel
-
I have some what of a love/hate relationship with COD. It's boring and repetitive, but I still play it for some reason.
-
Edited by Battlefielder: 9/4/2014 11:06:18 PMThat is like asking whether you prefer apples or oranges. A better question to ask is which do you prefer: COD, Halo, Titanfall, Destiny's Crucible, Killzone, or Blacklight: Retribution? Until Planetside 2 arrives, there is only one Battlefield.
-
1 ReplyDepends on how Advanced Warfare does. And Battlefield is trash without its 64 players.
-
Both are bad.
