{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Abyssal Shift:
12/20/2014 7:23:13 AM
6
how about we stop tying IB to Control since all the randoms treat it like deathmatch.
English
-
Lol it is deathmatch except you get more points for zones controlled
-
Either you are trolling me or you are too ignorant to get the point. If your team mates don't take and hold the zones then you are going to lose.
-
They are to focused on bounties. I finished a exotic bounty just now playing IB.
-
My point is that most of the bounties need killing to achieve. So why not attach IB to the Clash playlist. That makes more sense than having Killing Bounties in a Control setting. Also I complete my bounties just fine playing the objective. You get more kills defending anyway.
-
Or how about a CTF game type (could be 2 flag or neutral flag) for the Iron Banner. So we can still keep with the whole flag game concept and still have the deathmatch kind of play style for people trying to do bounties.
-
It still doesn't correct the underlying problem. If you are going to have bounties that focus on killing, then you can't put it in an objective playlist that only rewards you if you win. They can only do two things. Either change the playlist to clash so killing is all that matters, or change it so that even if you lose you still get rep, just not as much as the winning team.
