{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/23/2014 1:01:18 PM
8
If you could beat it with 5 players why would you kick an extra body that obviously knows how to shoot?....
English
-
Because OP is running a raid, not a charity. In a Raid you do what the Raid Leader tells you, or you don't do it at all.
-
So what you're saying is that the OP gained no advantage from having an extra guy that could keep adds off their backs, especially one that is boss at killing oracles? Ha. Charity. Right.
-
Unwilling to learn but expecting to have your teammates who [i]were[/i] willing do the lifting for you = charity.
-
I thought charity was getting nothing in return?
-
Correct. The 5 remaining people are not getting anything in return for carrying the one uncooperative raider. This is evident by the fact that they were able to beat the content with just 5 people, indicating the last person's presence was unnecessary and added no benefits to the team.
-
You can't really use that line of logic because you have no way of knowing that it took less time to do it without him.
-
Probably cuz the player was more of a liability and having him around means they had to depend on him, but still a bad move they could have just let him die. True leaders help the ones that are failing and teach them the ways.
-
My thoughts exactly - Just an ashol move for the sake of being an ashol. And yes I know how to spell a...hole;)
