{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Darkened:
3/16/2014 5:54:59 PM
32
Battlefield vs Call of duty franchise
Yes, both of these games, different in everyway but which franchise do you like more?
Battlefield with open environment war style fighting with a full arsenal of jets, tanks, copters, or call of duties close quarters and fast paced with kill streak awards?
Personal opinions also
-
1 ReplyEdited by MR E0S: 1/30/2014 12:28:01 AMTwisted Metal vs Call of Duty. Get it right. BF is just as dumb as CoD. The Modern Warfare setting is old. And that's what they have both been churning out since....well. Since they began. (YES WWII is still considered modern warfare) IF BF on the other hand decided to step outside the box and make a shooter with rubberbands and slingshots, maybe a tennis ball and racket..... IT might not be such a boring mess of a game. No really though. I choose Shadowrun. The only game in the last 20 odd years to actually make an FPS that wasn't just a straight copy-paste of every other shooter ever made. And you know where it screwed itself? In the one area where it did to a copy-paste. It copy-pasted Counter Strikes gamemode. Everything else though....
