What the -blam!- is a "tatoo"
Anyway
[quote]Both are being done against the child's consent[/quote]
Since when were tattoos given to children without their consent? Are we not talking about civilized societies here?
English
-
Edited by Flee: 6/15/2013 1:53:47 PM[quote]Since when did we allow irreversible surgery on childrens' genitals for no legitimate reason without their consent? Are we not talking about civilized societies here?[/quote]^Is the point OP is trying to make.
-
...I'm saying if parents gave their children tattoo's when they were babies, that would be frowned upon, yes?
-
Given the way your OP is worded, that wasn't made clear. Anyway, of course it's frowned upon, do you really have to ask why? I'm not going to debate with you about this though, because frankly I find it stupid. If you want to get pissy because of the last part of this comment, be my guest, but you'll be talking to yourself, because as I said, this is stupid.
-
Okay, so what I'm saying is, if it's frowned upon to give babies tattoo's, why is it okay to circumcise them? Both are being done without their consent, and both are for the most part useless, cause pain, and pretty permanent.