This is why you NEVER use wikipedia directly for a source. Th trick is to go onto wikipedia, find your article, and then click the link to the source. Provided that its a good source (use best judgement) then use it. But never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never never use wkipedia as a direct source. I know several professors that fail a paper, regardless of quality, if they see wikipedia in the bibliography.

I have yet to find bad info on wikipedia. I'm starting to think the hoax is everyone telling me that wikipedia is full of hoaxes.

I loved the "Bald for Bieber" movement. Got many laughs out of that. Also, on a side note, Wikipedia is great for research. If you know what you're doing, you can get a great initial understanding of a subject by reading the article, and then select sources that are linked for your actual references. People are foolish to use it as a source itself, but it practically hands you acceptable ones on a silver platter at the bottom of the article.