I would suggest in game choices that actually affect the end game outcome.
English
-
It still bothers me that people think this way. Your choices [b]did[/b] have effects. Just because they weren't readily apparent during the climax of the third game doesn't mean they weren't there. The third game itself [i]was[/i] the climax. You couldn't save Wrex and destroyed Maelon's data? Congratulations, you now either -blam!- the Krogans over or they'll -blam!- the galaxy over. Messed up Legion and his mission? Guess either the Quarians or Geth are getting exterminated. If you look at the game as the finale and not just the end segment of the game, it was all there. People just didn't want to look beyond the ending of the Reapers. Your choices may not have had a huge effect on their ending, but they had them else where.
-
All those choices made from previous games were reduced down to mere cameo appearances/segments just so they can swap out bit of dialogue for people who never played previous ME games. If bioware just simply stated that the indoctrination theory that was put on YouTube was real then I would have no problem with the game and claimed it to be the greatest game trilogy of all time.
-
Wow one game and this is all anybody cares about
-
Are you talking about The Witcher? A trilogy is more than 1. Even so, TW3 raises the bar for RPG games - no matter what, Biowares next game [u]will[/u] be compared to it. Kind of like how WoW was the groundbreaking standard setter for MMO games.
-
Even before the witcher everyone just thinks mass effect 3 was shot because of a good ending but 3 choices were the ending didn't change (visibly)
-
Oh! ME3... Yeah, then they shot themselves in the foot.
-
-
From what I hear, it was appalling and had to be redone.
-
Not at all all they had to do was add in the other 2 choices
-
So then I guess adding multiple endings was a pretty justified comment after all.
-
Yea it only had one good ending that was repeated 3 times for each ending in different colors
-
They should have removed the choice at the end and had your prior choices dictate the ending you got. Having you be able to choose your ending makes every decision you made up to that point seem much less relevant. That said, I didnt have a problem with the actual ending. The Reaper invasion was always the least interesting part of those games for me. The characters and inter species politics are what made it interesting.
-
Well, you have to consider that Mass Effect 3 is the ending for every subplot that was created during the previous games. Every choice does matter. For example, if you kill [spoiler]Wrex[/spoiler] in Mass Effect 1, you end up with [spoiler]Wreav[/spoiler] instead. From what you see during the Tuchanka Story, you know that [spoiler]Wreav[/spoiler] will [spoiler]-blam!- up everything[/spoiler] while [spoiler]Wrex[/spoiler] will [spoiler]Fix everything[/spoiler]. So in the end choices do matter, just not in the way people expected which is a pathetic expectation.