{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ZeonAlchemist99:
5/30/2015 6:33:35 AM
6
A three player fire-team should have a boot option by team vote. The fire-team leader issues the option and states the reason ex. Inactivity, so a 2-1 vote boots the AFK player. Same with a six player fire-team with a 5-1 vote.
English
-
Edited by Dog_Of_War_1138: 5/31/2015 2:58:46 AMThat option has some good points, but, as with anything, it would be vulnerable to abuse. I could foresee teams of 2 matched with a random who play up to the final boss, get it 1 shot away from dead, and then, just prior to winning and getting rewards, boot the third player as a "prank". If this seems cynical, it's only because I've encountered about 1 jerk for every 20 players in the strike playlists. And they seem to run in packs.
-
Edited by ZeonAlchemist99: 5/30/2015 7:56:36 PMSorry I should have been more clear I meant a fire team through matchmaking like a strike
-
Well, I thought that was what you meant, thanks for replying and clearing it up. That still leaves the problem of potential pranking/abuse though, if 1 member is matched with a team who are just plain jerks. I'll edit my reply to take yours into account.
-
Yeah my bad, I agree sometimes on strikes I get paired with one or two players that are AFK and I do all the work
-
It's the ones who seem OK until you get to the boss, then become useless, that aggravate me. I just spent 15 minutes getting there, and if I quit now, I don't get my rewards either, so I'm pretty much committed to finish the strike or else I completely wasted my time.
-
What's worse is you get crap rewards while the AFK players get good stuff
