{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by PippenOnXbox:
4/28/2015 7:37:40 PM
17
Best way to have a war?
Is Mortal Kombat style.
I mean seriously, they settle all of Earth Realms' issues with one on one kombat.
Anyone else think this is better than thousands of warriors slaughtering eachother in the middle of a populated city?
-
Or make the leaders brutally fight to the death
-
2 RepliesSword fighting. It's the most balanced and fare way of warfare. More Honorable and there's no way it can be op or nerfed.
-
EVERYBODY. WE'RE GOING OLDSCHOOL. EVERYONE GET TO RUST, NOW.
-
Blitzkrieg
-
Why don't we just turn the Olympics into war? That's basically what they are, after all. Various territories will be up for grabs; whoever wins a particular event gets a predetermined award. We'll set it based on current events, so Russia and the Ukraine can compete for the Crimea and Scotland can compete with England for sovereignty and stuff like that. It'll be good-natured I'm [i]sure[/i].
-
2 RepliesThe leaders should slug it out
-
Nukes
-
Trench warfare [spoiler]jk[/spoiler] [spoiler]takes too long[/spoiler] [spoiler]guerilla warfare best warfare[/spoiler]
-
Cold war
-
Shameless self Bumpity bump
-
Bio weapons
-
Diplomatic Congress
-
2 RepliesMassive Quickscope war with Interventions. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
-
1 Reply1v1 quickscope match
-
We could have major business decisions be made that way as well. Just have a corporate meeting room filled with macho men beating the shit out of each other.
-
-
No. With bananas, they are both delicious and deadly.
