What am i buying a new car or a game that is suppose to break boundaries with all the first time on a FPS content... That never came with it.

When World of Warcraft releases a content patch, there is typically a new daily quest hub and a new raid, and maybe an in-game event. World of Warcraft charges $15 per month, and major content patches occur roughly every six months.

I only partially agree. The DLC adds in what, 3 missions, 1 raid, 1 strike and 5 crucible maps? Halo map packs added in 3 multiplayer maps for $10, BF4 map packs add in 4 maps for $15. $20 for Destiny's content seems fair by comparison

Ummm if you bout the expansion pass it's only $35 for two of the expansions. And plus they haven't told us all the free little update that add content here and there. Plus there will most likely be more than just 2 expansions for destiny.

We dont know whats all in the DLC. Judt rumors and conjecture. I like the game, play it every day. Enjoy my time with my friends and will give bungie the time they asked for to give me the experience i want. Nothing perfect, especialy a video game and even more so one of this magnitude. There not asking for a monthly fee and still give us there weekly time and servers. Id like to see where this goes. Im buckled in. (Pre-ordered the DLC before i knew how the content would be handled) With that said. Im hoping a lot will be added in the story aspect. The gameplay is great.

WTF is this that you say SIR??? I pay 20$ dollars for what!!?? 3 missions?? 2 strikes?? 1 -blam!-*** RAID??? 2 hours worth of content for 20 FUc*** Dollars? Omg this cannot be real... It's madness a slap in the face a Free expansion on a Rpg AS THREE TIMES THE EFFING CONTENT!!!! And it's FUC**** FREE, Bungie DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS AND GET THID BULLSHIT ACTIVISION OFF YOUR CONTRACTS ITS RUINING THIS MASTERPIECE, THE GREED FOR OUR HARD EARNED MONEY OUR SWEAT STRESS BEHIND COMPUTERS WHATEVER PEOPLE DO FOR A LIVING, we PAY FOR THIS SHIT, but this Is A CONSTANT SLAP IN THE FACE WE GETTING, WE LOVE THIS BUT THIS LOVE FOR THIS GAME AND YOU BUNGIE ITS GETTING PUSHED AWAY BY THE GREED OF YOUR CORPORATES, sort out THE DLC GIVE US at least 10 missions not -blam!-ing 3 lol and more strikes OH AND GET THIS NEW RAID TO START OF AT MINIMUM OF level 29 or seriously we will complete it in two days max, DEEJ You Read this we respect you I respect you, don't let em kill what took you 5 years to develop.

THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING! Both DLC packs (I refuse to call them expansions because they're not) will double the content of a game that took everybody a month to do almost everything. Congrats Bungie, DLC 1 will add another 2 weeks to this game, and that's only if everybody wants to repeat the same crap over and over YET AGAIN. If this game is going to last 5 years, then they're going to need to release a LOT more than two measly DLC packs. I'm talking a Faction Expansion Pack (Faction shaders, class items, emblems, armor, weapons, missions, bounties, and new areas,) Crucible Expansions (Shaders, maps, PvP-oriented Gear, new vehicles, new playlists and gametypes, etc.) and quite a few other expansions. If they don't release massive quantities of DLC, this game will be dead by 2016.

If You have a base game like Mass effect or Halo or skyrim or fallout, vast and rich, dlc work.. If You have something like killzone, where the dlc are just skins and maps, they will die.. If You cut down content like in dead space the last part where You basically has to buy the end seperately You will damage the Brand on top ..

For me, DLC is a complicated matter. On paper, you can argue that for a third of the price of the game, the DLC should contain a third of the content... but is that really true? How much development time is actually put into the levels, missions, gear, and weapons? And, how much development time is put into creating/modifying a game engine to actually set up the rules of the world? There are a ton of factors that a person might take into consideration when buying a game. Generally, a sequel to a game takes the mechanics to a whole new level and it adds idea's that were previously scrapped due to time constraints. While a DLC merely extends what the base game offers. I rarely buy DLC because it's simply not worth it in my eyes. I regretted buying the season pass for Battlefield 3, I've found that all it did was create sub-sections to the base game. Metal Gear Rising and DmC: Devil May Cry did the same thing. You could only use the DLC characters within their own DLC world, and they would never cross-over to the base game or to the other DLC levels. I always feel like this is a missed opportunity. Planning out DLC isn't a bad thing at all, just like an author for a novel may plan out a series of novels, it can be really beneficial. I consider Sonic 3 & Knuckles to be a prime example of what DLC should strive to do. What I mean by this, the DLC shouldn't merely hold it's own, but it should also spill into the vanilla game to not only add new content, but to improve the content that's already there. I put around 80 hours into DmC: Devil May Cry, which is a ridiculous amount of time. With the DLC, I think I only put between 6-12 hours I believe. The only aspect of the DLC I enjoyed was the new playable character, but it was all contained within it's own shell. If the character was playable in the free Bloody Palace DLC, and also available to use in the vanilla game... then who knows how much more time I would have spent playing it. With multiplayer games, DLC has a lot of restrictions. With the case of Battlefield 2142, they had to give every player the soldier perks that came with the DLC. It wouldn't have been fair or balanced otherwise... but the problem with the DLC is still that they're contained within their own shells. With Battlefield 3, the added vehicles were contained within their DLC maps, and never spilled onto the vanilla maps or previous DLC's. This was a huge issue for me, since the DLC didn't improve anything... it just kept tacking on self-contained content. The weapons are an exception to this, but I've found that the added weapons did nothing to improve my enjoyment. How can they improve DLC for multiplayer games? I have no idea. On one hand, they have to make a profit, and on the other hand... well, they still need to make a profit. I have no idea how DLC for multiplayer games can be improved, I just know Destiny is one of the few that I'll be supporting. With Destiny, my expectations are that the DLC's will merely add more of the same content we've already played. Story missions will consist of the having your Ghost inspect things, while you shoot waves of enemies, occasionally having a boss fight at the end of the mission. Strike missions will consist of having your Ghost inspect things, while you shoot waves of enemies, always ending with a boss fight. If it's more or less the same content we've experienced already, wouldn't it be natural for us to ask for a generous amount? After all, they want us to spend 20 dollars further supporting their game rather than to use that same money on older titles or games that go on sale. As a consumer, I can't help but think "I can either pay 20 dollars for the same experience, or buy a different game that will offer an entirely new experience". With Destiny, I've already made my choice... I bought the season pass, and I'm likely going to enjoy the DLC considering I enjoy the base game. Aside from Destiny, I probably won't be buying DLC for any other game for quite a long time. Sometimes we crave more of the same thing, other times the content offered isn't worth the money and we would rather buy a new experience. I'm making an assumption here, but I would say that the original poster really enjoys Destiny, and he/she is concerned over the content they want. I want a generous amount of content for the DLC, and I'm sure we all want this too. For some of us, the place holder's for the new DLC just wouldn't be enough to be purchased, and it's perfectly natural for players to be concerned over this since they may want to extend Destiny's life as long as they can. A lot of players may even start to feel burned out on the game when the DLC releases, and this is another thing to consider. They may want to reignite the fire that made them love the game in the first place, and it can be underwhelming when DLC's don't do this. I think it's a safe assumption to make that any player will get bored of the DLC much quicker than they get bored of the base game. All in all, I agree with this post... while I'll likely enjoy the DLC regardless, I really hope Bungie has more content than the placeholders would suggest.

If they are going to try and make it last as long as WoW, they will surely need ALOT more content. Activision just need to let Bungie do there thing not trying sell DLCs every few months.