{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Reign of Bane:
9/2/2014 9:53:12 PM
39
ODST vs Reach Firefight, which do you prefer?
Are you Sergeant Johnson or a MKIII?
http://youtu.be/clPN7bZkIZA
http://youtu.be/5kcpJzmwWwA
[spoiler]ODST is bad arse so is Halo Reach![/spoiler]
[spoiler]Reach haters go to iamamindlesssheep.com[/spoiler]
[spoiler]Hell jumpers![/spoiler]
[spoiler]MKII![/spoiler]
[spoiler]#Inb4lemonsaysreachard[/spoiler]
-
3 RepliesODST was much better, besides the lag.
-
1 ReplyODST had a better feal to it.
-
3 RepliesI know I'm the minority, but firefight is the lamest game mode to exist. Spartan Ops was superior to it in every way.
-
I actually played some ODST firefight the other day. Getting the Endure achievement was one of my favorite achievements ever.
-
2 RepliesOne had actual elements of survival and one was used to grind with fuel rods and jetpacks
-
1 ReplyReach had matchmaking so it wins by default.
-
ME3 multiplayer. :P
-
Halo Reach has Firefight customization nuff said.
-
ODST by a long shot.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Siffera: 9/3/2014 7:59:52 PMODST had much greater maps than Halo: Reach. Sure, Reach has customization, but all it ended up doing was turning Firefight into a five year olds dream; No challenge, and easy as hell.
-
12 RepliesReach had firefight
-
1 ReplyODST was a greater challenge, but Reach was more fun overall.
-
7 RepliesEdited by SaferMurderweapon: 9/3/2014 6:53:40 PMI prefer Reach's Firefight for the extra features as a game mode but I prefer ODST as a game. If my friends asked me if we should play firefight, I would say ODST.
-
1 ReplyI prefer ODST's FF because of the challenge me and my friends got in it.
-
1 ReplyODST was better at being challenging. Reach had customisation going for it though.
-
1 ReplyODST was rage inducing.
-
1 ReplyODST's was much more fun to play for me.
-
1 ReplyODST was more fun, felt more like survival mode than reaches. We played a shit ton of firefight in ODST as the maps were good and the challenge, reach was boring.
-
5 RepliesODST's was more fun and challenging, for the short time I had a squad for 4 to play with, it was great. You have to be coordinated and communicate with each other. Man,I need to get those Firefight achievements.
-
1 ReplyODST because it was plain and simple
-
4 RepliesODST was a lot harder, picked it up yesterday on heroic and that was a pain in the ass. Definitely nostalgia inducing, if anything.
-
1 ReplyReach
-
1 ReplyODST Felt like a Survival mide.
-
1 ReplyEdited by Smarkdow: 9/3/2014 12:31:41 AMDue to the sheer versatility and amount of customization, Reach FF is objectively superior to ODSTs. ODST's FF got old, really quickly, and playing as an ODST felt no different from playing as a Spartan. You had shields (stamina), just like a Spartan. You could pick up any weapon and even detach and carry a heavy turret around like a Spartan; so I don't buy into the "Playing as an ODST made it feel more like a desperate fight for survival" schtick.
-
1 ReplyODST was more challenging/rewarding but Reach was more diverse and over-the-top. I'm gonna have to go with ODST, though.
-
Firefight is back.
