Both being great games i wanted to hear the public viewpoint on which game is not only better in quality and enjoyment, but also as well as difficulty or memorability. Personally I prefer the first one being the bosses were more iconic and posed a much greater threat. Dark souls 2 reused Ornstein and the gargoyles. Although iconic they weren't anything new and bosses like the old iron king were cool but way too easy. Dont get me started on the dragon riders. Anyways, what do you guys think?
-
Edited by KingKrown: 7/30/2014 11:52:58 AMI enjoyed them both, Dark Souls 2 had better controls,Weapons all had a point,Dual wielding was much better, environments looked better , exploring was great, however they reused bosses & areas. The Royal Rat looks like Sif 2.0 minus the feels, the bosses aren't as intimidating. Dark Souls 1 had a vague story, but you were left to interpret the context as you please. 2 was just too vague. I felt like it was easier because I played 1 so much, but again I enjoyed them both a lot.