{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/8/2014 5:33:50 PM
28
Titanfall max players capped at 6v6
[url=http://www.polygon.com/2014/1/8/5287114/titanfall-maximum-player-count-is-6v6]That's 12 human players plus the AI.[/url] To those who are used to the small-scale battles of most Halo and CoD gametypes, I assume this won't be a big deal. Some Battlefield folks may be a little annoyed. I trust the developers to figure out what works for their games.
-
If anyone here complains about it, please watch this video. It was actually quite the smart decision by the Devs.
-
Seems more like a downgrade but I guess that's ok considering 8v8 can be just as fun as a 2v2.
-
6v6 is perfect. No one like a clusterfuck, especially with mechs...
-
3 RepliesI came so close to actually liking this game, and then this shit shows up.. Oh well, I guess I'll just keep playing all my other games. Watch_Dogs gets the preorder, folks.
-
1 ReplyA.I? Makes me think of Battlefront. If I could play this game offline with A.I. I buy it in a heart beat.
-
More Players ALWAYS Means More Fun - Up at Noon http://m.ign.com/videos/2014/01/15/more-players-always-means-more-fun-up-at-noon
-
*grabs popcorn*
-
Do we really need 64 mechs on the battlefield? Different games have different scales. Besides, it sounds like Battlefront and Firefight Versus from Halo Reach. Great things together it seems.
-
3 RepliesHere is a legit conversation between people who have played it. Good insight on 6v6[spoiler]also it's funny when they call out sony fanboys. [/spoiler] Titanfall: Why 6 vs. 6 is Fine http://m.ign.com/videos/2014/01/08/titanfall-why-6-vs-6-is-fine-podcast-unlocked
-
2 RepliesNo source. Troll.
-
Edited by tntbabin: 1/10/2014 6:34:32 PMHmmm, not sure how I feel bout this yet.
-
[quote]Educated and dignified patrician: "Xbox One has no games."[/quote][quote]Xbox One Year Olds: "B-b-but muh Titanfall!"[/quote]
-
People can't judge this because they haven't even played it yet.
-
It is surprising news, but I think people are making this out to be worse than it actually is. I'll at least get the game in my hands first before making a judgement like that.
-
17 RepliesEdited by nao: 1/8/2014 7:00:02 PMThe price of this game is quickly becoming a joke to me. Feel bad for the fools who go for this: [quote]The game's Collector's Edition costs $249.99 and includes a 20-inch Titan statue.[/quote]
-
This is going to be good
-
13 RepliesTruly next gen. No single player. 6v6 matches. £45 price tag.
-
Edited by Xmark120: 1/8/2014 7:06:31 PMI haven't been on B.net for a couple of months now. But now that I'm back, I'm noticing that the straight out fanboy praise for this game has somewhat diminished.
-
That's a little disappointing but I'm a battlefield gamer so I'm used to 32v32
-
1 ReplyEdited by Hylebos: 1/8/2014 7:05:48 PMI honestly can't remember the size of the build I played at Pax. I'd like to say it was at least 3v3, but I'm not sure.
-
2 RepliesI don't get the appeal of having less human players and adding AI.
-
It really should've been switched. AI should never be put over the players.
-
ROFLMAO
-
2 RepliesThere was already a huge thread on this, I'm sure you saw it.
-
1 ReplyGames that go over 24 player matches tend to end up as cluster-blam!-s anyway.
-
It's also filled with Ai, so this might be as chaotic as a normal human vs human match at 24 players or higher. If not, oh boy.
