{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by xXIronSausageXx:
10/25/2013 2:36:03 AM
55
Have you found Jesus?
The second coming of our lord Jesus Christ is coming March 13, 2014. Praise be to Titanfall.
-
Game looks meh. I'm honestly not that excited.
-
No but I found her
-
titanfall is probably going to be worth $60 at least it will be better than cod
-
Save Your Money For Destiny?
-
Equivalent to Call of Duty! No I don't see Marines parkouring on walls with Jetpacks and walking talks! Nothing like Call of Duty, Call of Duty multiplayer is the equivalent to Metal Slug!
-
So? They did good in focusing only on multiplayer instead of a campaign that nobody will like.
-
Probably just get it on Ps4
-
It's worth it. The game looks awesome.
-
I think 60$ is worth- -Battlefield and cod mixed -first person parkour -GIANT FREAKING TRANSFORMERS YOU CAN CONTROL TO CAUSE CHAOS. Yup. True story.
-
1 ReplyWow, $60 for a game that hasn't even released yet? What a rip off! I'm gonna go make more ridiculous accusations!
-
A lot of maps, maybe?
-
I have put 90 hours into pokemon X at $40. I can't justify purchasing anything at $60 anymore.
-
Divide how much you pay by how much time you will spend on it and it's really not all that much.
-
I was fortunate enough to play Titanfall at PAX and it blew me away. They nailed the game feel beautifully; the mobillity is a fantastic breath of fresh air, the Titans don't feel like a win-more powerup and exist in a nice equilibrium with the Pilots, it's just straight up good. It's entirely fine if you're not interested in multiplayer or the game itself, but I place a high value on my entertainment and I'm entirely happy to spend $60 on a game that will bring me well over 60 hours of entertainment. I feel the decision to omit the singleplayer was a wise move: it would likely be a play once and forget experience anyways, recomitting those resources that would have gone into making and testing the part that people will return for again and again seems like the wisest move. It certainly isn't a rip off just because it values quality over quantity.
-
Online only because it uses online assets necessary for the game. And yes, instead of a tacky campaign they are doing something new and melding the two together. AI and human players with story. Oh and try to jump over a fence without a script built in on CoD. Titanfall's thruster is Halo's jump. It allows you to make full use of the map.
-
4 RepliesHonestly, it seems that the only games with good singleplayer anymore are the ones that concentrate on it solely/primarily. The same goes for multiplayer. So, I think I'm ok with Titanfall putting everything it has into the multiplayer.
-
5 RepliesI figure since its basically half a game it should cost half as much.
-
So you'd rather resources wasted on a half-assed single player shoe-horned in just for the sake of it being there?
-
1 ReplyIf you can get 60 hours out of it and have fun, then it's worth it.
-
7 RepliesYou get way more hours out of multiplayer so that's some pretty retarded logic there OP.
-
1 ReplyMaybe $40 or so would be an alright price. Unless it's actually packed with so much content.
-
The game doesn't look that great to me but I'll atleast try it.
-
5 RepliesAt least it won't end up like near every Battlefield campaign- played once then forgotten.
-
[quote]You're lucky you don't live in Australia. Then you'd be whinging about wasting at least $100.[/quote] Oh no! $60 for a video game! That is [i]horrendous[/i].
-
You're lucky you don't live in Australia. Then you'd be whinging about wasting at least $100.
-
Lol. If they made a single player it would probably be half assed and shit, I'd much rather they focused on one mode and made it the best they can. No use in wasting resources.
