JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
3/31/2013 7:04:41 PM
17

Will the Hobbit Trilogy be viewed as Star Wars' Prequel trilogy?

Assuming the quality of the next two films are around the same as the first film, do you think the Hobbit Trilogy will be viewed as the Star Wars' Prequel trilogy to most people? As in, vastly inferior, tarnished the original series' reputation, etc? Or do you think the Hobbit films will be held in a higher pedestal?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • All I know is that there is a dragon in the next one, so it can't be bad.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You realize the story for the Hobbit was written years before LOTR, right?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by GKR: 4/1/2013 9:04:20 PM
    0
    Absolutely not. Although An Unexpected Journey wasn't as good as any of the Lord of the Rings films, the new trilogy will never be viewed with such hatred the Star Wars prequels receive. The Hobbit won't alter previously established lore, have humor that appeals to toddlers (though in my opinion Radagast is a bit too bizarre), or completely change the appearance of the franchise.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    2 Replies
    • An Unexpected Journey was better than The Two Towers, in my opinion. So no. It's gonna be -blam!-ing impossible to top Return of the King, though, considering it's my favourite film of all time. Come on, Jackson. Give it a shot.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      2 Replies
      • Unless they completely fix all the things they messed up, then I will. Unexpected Journey suffered from alot of the problems that Phanton Menace did. Not many people disliked the Hobbit though for some reason so it will probably be viewed as a good trilogy.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        1 Reply
        • Yes, except no.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        • Lord of the Rings is a terrible series anyway.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        • It's only a prequel in the movie sense. Tolkien wrote the Hobbit long before the LOTR trilogy.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        • In relation to the LOTR trilogy yes. Not in general probably though.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        • No. The Hobbit is pretty good.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          1 Reply
          • Edited by Madman Mordo: 3/31/2013 7:48:23 PM
            What about the middle ground? Sure okay, it wasn't on par with the original trilogy, but it had relatively large boots to fill, and I don't think that was the original intention anyway. The Hobbit is good in its own right. It doesn't try to replicate Lord Of The Rings or live up to its expectations. It goes a different route and tries to tell a story in its own unique perspective. So in a way, the two trilogies probably shouldn't even be compared. I think it's slightly unfair that everyone is comparing them. The Hobbit has limited content due to there being only one book, whereas Lord Of The Rings had 3.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            3 Replies
            • Nah. I really liked the Hobbit. Besides, we still have two films left. I can't make a judgement like that quite yet. If they're on the same level, I'd be OK with it.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            • I am personally looking forward to it, the first one was quite good even though it had a different feel than the LotR but so did the book.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            • Edited by God: 3/31/2013 7:16:49 PM
              0
              My only complaint with the first one was that half the time it looked like a video game and there was a lot of [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ds4xhz-xIY] big lipped alligator moments[/url] like the [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nxC18gs1V4]rock-em-sock-em golems. [/url] Other that that it stayed true to the source material, which admittedly is not as epic as the LotR trilogy, and a lot of the stuff they added like the pale orc and necromancer only improve the original story. I don't think it's fair to really compare it to the main trilogy since it's a different kind of story and it's not exactly intended to live up to the same level of expectation.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            • Theres going to be three Hobbit films? Why...

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              3 Replies
              • Nah. The first one was actually very good. Bilbo (and his actor) were both fantastic. There were some changes I didn't agree with, but overall I think they did a fantastic job.

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              • Edited by OptimusPrime 15: 3/31/2013 7:08:35 PM
                I don't think so. I found the first one to be very good. I think the prequel trilogy got a lot of flack because of the way Anakin was portrayed. Bilbo is awesome. The first movie was incredibly good and I hope the next 2 do the same. I still think the original trilogy will be considered better in the long run.

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              You are not allowed to view this content.
              ;
              preload icon
              preload icon
              preload icon