{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by TruthHurts:
1/20/2015 10:31:53 PM
27
What do you think more beneficial in control? KDR or SPM?
Let's say two teams are playing iron banner or control. One team is camping one flag and have gun skill and the other team has two flags but lose all their gun fights and feed team A kills. Who should win? The team going for KDR successfully or the team going for score per minute but die constantly?
Edit: also don't forget the original question. KDR Vs. SPM. I personally think a person who went flawless and is second on your team did better than the person with the most points but had a .5 KDR like 18-36 or something.
-
9 RepliesWell, my understanding is that in control you cap the control points to increase the points per kill. Your team doesn't get any points just for holding the control points. So yeah, holding one point and getting ALL the kills, your team will clearly win. Controll is still all about kills, just get more or less points per kill based on how much of the map your team has. In theory you could win control by holding no control points if everyone on your team has zero deaths. Obviously this would not happen in any real game where everyone is trying, but just a statement about how points are scored in that game mode.
