Halo 4 is objectively a terrible game. I personally think so, therefore it must be a fact. How could you challenge my eschatological wisdom? The problem with Halo 4 is basically that it isn't Halo 3 with a slightly different graphics style and maps. Halo 4 has these weird things called loadouts in multiplayer. Since these were popular in CoD this automatically means that CoD invented them. Seeing as Halo has Loadouts and Killcams this means that it is copying CoD which is ipso facto terrible because, for some reason, CoD is the worst game ever made. Whilst it could be argued that loadouts make the game fresh and new I do not like it because it reminds me of CoD and not Halo 3. There are other fatal flaws in this game. One is that it looks identical and plays identical to Halo Reach. Because of this, I amusingly call the game Halo Reach 2.0 so others can see I have made a truly original observation. Halo Reach 2.0 is going to be terrible because Halo Reach was terrible, because that wasn't Halo 3 either. Another problem the two games share is that they don't respect the canon of the books enough. Unfortunately, Bungie the people who created the universe, think it is ok to override the books. Bungie have even encouraged 343 Industries to do the same. A very big problem with the game, that deserves mention is how Master Chief's armour changes in cryosleep. This is literally impossible and is such a big deal to me that I will continue to never shut up about it in forums. 343 instantly ruined the game when they didn't think through such an issue. This is a really big deal and should not be taken lightly. I could just load up and play Halo 3 but that would be too logical. Instead, I will waste my time on Bungie.net, a forum that has nothing to do with the future of Halo anymore, and will complain and nitpick about anything concerning Halo 4 and anything else of Halo. Halo 4 sucks and it is a terrible game. Don't put your money into a CoD clone.