{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/15/2012 11:37:36 PM
14
Are the moniters pure AI?
Earlier today, i was browsing the terminals from the anniversary, and the terminals from halo 4. Then, i had an idea that the monitors like guilty spark, could have been specially chosen forerunners who were put into the monitors bodies by the composer. Since you people seem to be experts on this sort of thing, are the monitors pure AI, or were they forerunners who were put into the monitor's bodies by the composer?
-
That part has yet to revealed, the second Forerunner book did not leave us with chakas as 343 being the caretaker of 04. The narrative left us at two points: 1) Chakas being an incomplete 343, with Born-Didact after talking to the Primordial, or something of the like. 2) 343 taking control of a human vessel at an unspecified date, seeking the Librarian to recover Riser and Vinn...whatever's spirits, after he has concluded that two of the oni/science team contains their spirits, like he with the Lord of Admirals.(I read somewhere that this was a backup 343 created, possibly after the 04's caretaker was destroyed, or created beforehand and released elsewhere.) So we must wait for the final book in the forerunner saga of books, or Halo 5 will provide us with some more terminals on this matter.
