Halo Reach has a much higher skill gap compared to 4.. but it's still Reach. At least I can play Reach for more than 2 games unlike Halo 4.
Which do you prefer and why? Which is better and why?
-
Reach is teh best. [Edited on 01.05.2013 3:37 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Drowsy Demon reach[/quote] My experience on reach was much longer as I kept coming back and kept enjoying myself.. >:D [Edited on 01.05.2013 3:38 PM PST]
-
I prefer reach. Halo 4 is too much like COD. It took all the bad of reach and made it worse.
-
Reach MLG ZBNS V7
-
Halo 4
-
Halo 4.
-
4. Reach is horrendous. Neither are great though.
-
I dislike both, however i can play more then 1 game in reach without turning off my console. Halo 4 is way to random and i dont like classed based games.
-
-
H4 for campaign, but neither for MP.
-
Halo 4 should have kept the pre-set loadouts like Reach had. And as much as I would like to go back to no loadouts, I don't think that's gonna happen. [Edited on 01.05.2013 3:39 PM PST]
-
Call of Duty. Honestly, more fun than both of those. Flame me.
-
I still love Reach. 4 was a good way to allow a great series to live on, but Reach will always be better
-
Halo Reach. Sorry, Halo 4 but if I wanted to play an arcade game I would play Call of Duty. Anyways, Reach has more replayability. You have more custom options, you have a matchmaking system that updated every month, campaign theater, campaign scoring, the ai aren't as dumb as Halo 4 they actual try to dodge your bullets, easier to glitch out of the level in Halo Reach compared to Halo 4(-blam!- rocks and kill barriers), Halo Reach had you learn the spawn times and spawns of weapons, I honestly could go on. There is so much missing from Halo 4 that honestly, I don't know if it is worth keeping anymore. I keep coming back to Reach and Halo 3, and all I want to do with Halo 4 is snap it and put it in the cat liter. That is all it is worth, poop.
-
Reach.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] TH3_AV3NG3R Halo Reach. Sorry, Halo 4 but if I wanted to play an arcade game I would play Call of Duty. Anyways, Reach has more replayability. You have more custom options, you have a matchmaking system that updated every month, campaign theater, campaign scoring, the ai aren't as dumb as Halo 4 they actual try to dodge your bullets, easier to glitch out of the level in Halo Reach compared to Halo 4(-blam!- rocks and kill barriers), Halo Reach had you learn the spawn times and spawns of weapons, I honestly could go on. There is so much missing from Halo 4 that honestly, I don't know if it is worth keeping anymore. I keep coming back to Reach and Halo 3, and all I want to do with Halo 4 is snap it and put it in the cat liter. That is all it is worth, poop.[/quote] I agree though I will wait till the rank system and Competitive playlists come out before I decide whether to sell it.
-
Reach
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] CurvedBubbles Halo Reach has a much higher skill gap compared to 4.. [/quote] Lel
-
Halo 3 has the best matchmaking. Halo: reach has the best custom games. Halo 4 is -bIam!-.
-
Halo 4. What've we got? Colour. Fun movement speed and jump height. Better gunplay and audio. Well, I was just thinking about the moment-to-moment gameplay of MP, but Halo 4 is superior to Reach in a metric -blam!--ton of ways.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] GohanRules 12 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] TH3_AV3NG3R Halo Reach. Sorry, Halo 4 but if I wanted to play an arcade game I would play Call of Duty. Anyways, Reach has more replayability. You have more custom options, you have a matchmaking system that updated every month, campaign theater, campaign scoring, the ai aren't as dumb as Halo 4 they actual try to dodge your bullets, easier to glitch out of the level in Halo Reach compared to Halo 4(-blam!- rocks and kill barriers), Halo Reach had you learn the spawn times and spawns of weapons, I honestly could go on. There is so much missing from Halo 4 that honestly, I don't know if it is worth keeping anymore. I keep coming back to Reach and Halo 3, and all I want to do with Halo 4 is snap it and put it in the cat liter. That is all it is worth, poop.[/quote] I agree though I will wait till the rank system and Competitive playlists come out before I decide whether to sell it.[/quote] Honestly, rank systems only work if the game is competitive which means they would have to get rid of all the gimmicks they have. I am not sure if there is going to be a competitive playlist, though because didn't MLG say they aren't going to do anything with Halo 4? I am not sure but I swear there was a thread on this site talking about MLG and Halo 4.
-
Yeah, I liked pre-TU Reach. Shame it got ruined after that.
-
Reach definitely.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Dreadnough7 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] CurvedBubbles Halo Reach has a much higher skill gap compared to 4.. [/quote] Lel[/quote] It's true, you can clearly tell a good player from a bad player in Reach, not so much in Halo 4.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Tartan 118 Halo 4. What've we got? Colour. Fun movement speed and jump height. [u]Better gunplay and [b]audio.[/b][/u] Well, I was just thinking about the moment-to-moment gameplay of MP, but Halo 4 is superior to Reach in a metric -blam!--ton of ways.[/quote]Whoa whoa whoa whoawhoawhoa
-
It really burns to say this, but Reach. Halo 4's lack of features that even Reach had makes it less playable. Reach's campaign is much more replayable (I only feel like playing Midnight if I ever feel like going through Halo 4's campaign). Plus, I have a lot of nostalgia not for the Reach gameplay itself but for its atmosphere.