JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Halo
0
SAtHyA96

SAtHyA96

11/12/2010 11:27:53 PM
You ungrateful bastards. I just saw the comment 'Bungie doesn't listen to its fans' and I am now so angry that I had to make my point. BUNGIE. IS. THE. BEST. DEVELOPER. IN. TERMS. OF. FAN. INTERACTION. FOR. ANY. SHOOTER. [url=http://www.callofduty.com/hub]This is the COD website. Notice the amazing amount of updates, blog posts and forums with amazing site structure...[/url] [url=http://www.treyarch.com/info]Even more amazingness![/url] You guys are so ungrateful. I am seeing 'Halo 3 was better' THIS IS SO WRONG! I played some halo 3 last night and it was terrible! I stuck with halo 3 for THREE FRIKIN YEARS and last night I couldn't believe how crap it was. Game on Last resort, it was awful. Reach is incredible. It is fast-paced. All of you Black-ops lovers like it for one simple reason: Kills take 1 second. Meaning if you don't need to work for kills. In CODBLOPS, you just hold the trigger (or r1 button in the case of ps3 fans who have nothing else to play which is why the game has so many players and play on a controller with no triggers) and get the kill INSTANTLY. You don't have to earn the best weapons. You spawn with them. So there's no weapon control, because if player X is owning you with the sniper, you just hit start and click 'Z0MG I WANT SNIPER' and you get it. [url=http://www.callofduty.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=316681&sid=e0vamf76htdg1o9jkt0crlhit4]Other shooters have no flaws, do they?[/url] Reach has its flaws like Armour lock (which needs to be toned down and this is a widely debated, but accepted, fact) but believe me, like other players have said, every halo game (besides Halo CE because it was offline on xbox) has been very bad at the start and improved dramatically with the first title update. Title updates don't just come like Harry potter waving his frikin wand, bungie has to listen to all our responses and take the time to get everything together. There will probably be an update around the release of the noble map pack so that they can add the achievements and this WILL HAVE CHANGES TO REACH. And you trolls, if you come on our forums saying 'Reach sucks' THAT IS NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY -blam!--ING OPINION ON REACH. AS LONG AS THERE ARE 15 OTHER PEOPLE ONLINE I AM HAPPY TO PLAY REACH UNTIL THEY SHUT IT DOWN. [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No3e1meC-KQ]Flaws in halo games are always fixed. [/url] Remember that. I am having a blast playing reach, and I am hearing things like. 'Halo sucks'. I responded 'Go play Black Ops then'. They said 'Shut up halo fanboy, halo reach is crap.' But you know what, THEY PLAYED 10 MORE GAMES WITH ME. What other shooters can you use a frikin' jetpack in? Huh? Exactly. No forge in Black-ops. No Firefight in Medal of Honour. No Theater mode in... um... Killzone. Just be grateful for the amazing -blam!- this game has given us. And, just to prove how confident I am, I can answer ANY argument about reach with a positive response. Go. [quote] Everything in life is a gift. There are people out there with Real issues. This is just a game. [/quote] This was sent to me in a PM: [quote] [b] Posted By: [/b] IxI Zeal IxI I enjoyed your post, and agree that many of the "fans" simply complain about EVERYTHING. However justified they may feel, I feel that Reach is an exceptional game and arguably the best in the series in terms of story and campaign. I believe people are upset with Reach for two main reasons: the lack of a numbered ranking system and the difficultly and precision required to DMR. Regardless if there is an update released by the developers, players will still be complaining. [/quote] [Edited on 11.12.2010 4:30 PM PST]

Edit Preview Cancel

preload icon
preload icon
preload icon
You are not allowed to view this content.