JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
5/9/2009 3:41:32 PM
179

Halo vs Star Trek

StarWars GearsofWar(s) What about Star Trek? Halo vs Star Trek?
English
#Offtopic #Flood

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • star trek i think because of the vastly better ships and fire power the only weapon halo could do some serious damage with is the mac gun but a star ship from star trek could knock that out as they have pretty damn good targeting which would also greatly reduce the affect of the archer missiles and of course the torpedoes are just so over powered the unshielded UNSC ships would be mince meat

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Phasers? Photon, Quantum, anti-matter and planet-buster torpedoes? Metaphasic Shields? KLINGON'S? Star-trek, Halo has nothing to compete with.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • He said Halo vs Star Trek, not UNSC vs Star Trek. UNSC, Covenant, Forerunner... Think of the whole universe.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Halo will never lose, the worst is a draw because Halo's destroys everything.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Skibur He said Halo vs Star Trek, not UNSC vs Star Trek. UNSC, Covenant, Forerunner... Think of the whole universe.[/quote] oh i know i just haven't decided for the covy and fore's yet thought i think the covy would be almost even with the federation

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Skibur He said Halo vs Star Trek, not UNSC vs Star Trek. UNSC, Covenant, Forerunner... Think of the whole universe.[/quote] Borg /thread.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Flood man, They do damage, like chuck norrises boot

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I think Halo would win . One spartan on each starship it would be over. Off Topic Spock in the new movie would be my Bar Fight Buddy. : >)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Well, this is at least a little more evenly matched than Star Wars vs. Star Trek or Star Wars vs. Halo.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Skibur He said Halo vs Star Trek, not UNSC vs Star Trek. UNSC, Covenant, Forerunner... Think of the whole universe.[/quote] Like he said, Start Trek is pretty screwed up just by facing the Covenant itself xD

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Wait, for which is more nerdy?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Forerunners, Precursors, and the flood FTW.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I could never get into Star Trek. Probably because I wasn't born in its "glory days."

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MasterSin [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Skibur He said Halo vs Star Trek, not UNSC vs Star Trek. UNSC, Covenant, Forerunner... Think of the whole universe.[/quote] Like he said, Start Trek is pretty screwed up just by facing the Covenant itself xD[/quote] . . . The Q would just walk in there, blink them out of existence and keep on walking.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Halo, Because the technology on star trek is Terrible. Face it everytime the main ship gets shot at the bridge has wires hanging from the ceiling. UNSC would win

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Snitch Life I could never get into Star Trek. Probably because I wasn't born in its "glory days."[/quote] The 90's? Surely you were born right before or during it's glory days.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Agusta1 Halo, Because the technology on star trek is Terrible. Face it everytime the main ship gets shot at the bridge has wires hanging from the ceiling. UNSC would win[/quote] . . . With what? They don't have the gunz to do it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Omnicent [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Agusta1 Halo, Because the technology on star trek is Terrible. Face it everytime the main ship gets shot at the bridge has wires hanging from the ceiling. UNSC would win[/quote] . . . With what? They don't have the gunz to do it.[/quote] Ever heard of a MAC gun? Or the Archer nuclear missiles? Not to mention every ship has a full compliment of Longsword fighters. Granted, Starfleet has shields, but so did the Covenant.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] GhostLink2401 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Omnicent [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Agusta1 Halo, Because the technology on star trek is Terrible. Face it everytime the main ship gets shot at the bridge has wires hanging from the ceiling. UNSC would win[/quote] . . . With what? They don't have the gunz to do it.[/quote] Ever heard of a MAC gun? Or the Archer nuclear missiles? Not to mention every ship has a full compliment of Longsword fighters. Granted, Starfleet has shields, but so did the Covenant.[/quote] Right. . . Covies have energy shields, Starfleet has metaphasic shields which are many, many times more powerful. Starfleet has Sovereign, Galaxy and Defiant class ships, all carrying enough firepower to not only glass a planet, but crack it in two. Nuclear missiles would do nothing, hell, even the original Enterprise shrugged off one or two of those, not to mention most of the ships in startrek have been through a black-hole, back in time, forward in time, caught in super-novas and a whole array of crap that would have blown a UNSC frigate sky-high. MAC? It would bounce off the shields like a rubberball and the Longsword's would be swatted like flies by the 10+ banks of phasers. I'd say one torpedo and the fight is over, failing that, we could just call in the Klingons, or the Vulcans or even the Q. . . If he felt like it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • back from a long think over this and i have concluded the flood and forerunners would be the only ones that stand any kind of chance as a lot of people are thinking the main couple from the star trek federation Klingon ect ect but when you put the federation, Klingon's, romulans, Borg, Dominion, cardasians, breen, species 8472 as just the start halo is out numbered by stupid numbers as each race from star trek has a fleet the size of the covy's so in space it's a ratio of 3:8 (flood doesn't have fleet) even with spartens it would be a masacre because it would only take one borg to steal the forerunner tech and then it would be over with only the flood left that could cause problems (althought not sure what would happen if 8472 got flooded up)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Now, the whole [b]"Star Trek vs Star Wars"[/b] thing is a proud geek tradition, and both sides can make compelling cases... But the Halo universe cannot compete in the slightest. They're completely outclassed in so many ways that it would be tiresome to list them. -Please don't say "The Halo books say SO!" Not a legit argument. -Also, the whole "The Halo rings kill EVERYTHING" argument is pointless. Halo 1 taught us that you can blow up a Halo ring by overloading the engines of a mid-size ship and chucking in a grenade.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Halo

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • well HALO may fail on some fronts but on the ground halo would probbaly have the upper hand with spartan lazers/ scarab tanks/ ODST's/ covenant drop pods stealth troops and sheilds i have to say yes the star treck universe may have a match in space but on the ground even though there are more species the mix of unsc and covenent would i have to say even out the playing field not just b cause of the troops but also because of the naval craft the halo series use cause in startreck they dont seem to have many ground vehicles or much in the way of naval atg craft so yes space halo may lose but on the ground with help from a joint force of UNSC/ covenent/ and forerunners they would probs lose or meet a fair match especialy if the covenant can build their super turrets /aa turrets but im probs wrong lol

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Son of Valhalla Now, the whole [b]"Star Trek vs Star Wars"[/b] thing is a proud geek tradition, and both sides can make compelling cases... But the Halo universe cannot compete in the slightest. They're completely outclassed in so many ways that it would be tiresome to list them. -Please don't say "The Halo books say SO!" Not a legit argument. -Also, the whole "The Halo rings kill EVERYTHING" argument is pointless. Halo 1 taught us that you can blow up a Halo ring by overloading the engines of a mid-size ship and chucking in a grenade.[/quote]^this Star Wars vs Trek is a very interesting scenario, but I don't know the size of the Trek galaxy. There are many trillions in Star Wars, is there around that in Trek?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • o ya and dnf that nukes/ archer mistiles also give off slight emp when they explode in a void enviroment

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Dark Lord PJ back from a long think over this and i have concluded the flood and forerunners would be the only ones that stand any kind of chance as a lot of people are thinking the main couple from the star trek federation Klingon ect ect but when you put the federation, Klingon's, romulans, Borg, Dominion, cardasians, breen, species 8472 as just the start halo is out numbered by stupid numbers as each race from star trek has a fleet the size of the covy's so in space it's a ratio of 3:8 (flood doesn't have fleet) even with spartens it would be a masacre because it would only take one borg to steal the forerunner tech and then it would be over with only the flood left that could cause problems (althought not sure what would happen if 8472 got flooded up)[/quote] Hell, if the Borg can't even assimilate 8472, the Flood have no hope and it's more like 1:100 000, seeing as the Borg own most of the Delta quadrant, the Dominion can pump out ships and soldiers like they were paper hats and Startrek has it's own version of Forerunners. Halo = Pwnt.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon